Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#1147306
Eupithecia scabrogata - Eupithecia gilvipennata

Eupithecia scabrogata - Eupithecia gilvipennata
In Westwood by outdoor night light; elevation 5100ft, Lassen County, California, USA
April 30, 2012
Size: Forewing length 14mm
Species ID for this specimen to species Eupithecia scabrogata provided by BOLD Systems via DNA.

See here for Eupithecia scabrogata species page at BOLD Systems:
And here for BOLD's Public Data Portal - BIN Page for this specimen.
And here for this specimen's DNA Record Page at BOLD Systems.

Although Eupithecia scabrogata seems to be listed as a synonym of Eupithecia gilvipennata here on BugGuide (see here: (1)), this specimen's DNA was not close enough to the DNA of this specimen of E. gilvipennata (see here: (2)) to be considered a match.

These two species are still listed as separate species at BOLD Systems: E. scabrogata, and E. gilvipennata

Images of this individual: tag all
Eupithecia scabrogata - Eupithecia gilvipennata Eupithecia scabrogata - Eupithecia gilvipennata

Moved to Eupithecia gilvipennata
Moved from Eupithecia scabrogata.

Tentative ID based mostly on range. See comments below.

Moved
Moved from Eupithecia.

 
Thank you Steve!
I had forgot about this specimen. Thank you for the new species page.

In my local, the host plant could only be Green leaf manzanita - Arctostaphylos patula, with the assumption, thus, that this moth species may feed on more than one species of manzanita.

 
E. gilvipennata
Sorry for my confusion on this. Until more evidence comes in, I think this should be placed in E. gilvipennata.

BOLD: To be certain about the identification for many (most?) Eupithecia, dissection would, I think, be needed until BOLD gets representatives from each branch of the taxon tree for this genus verified by genitalia. Even then, there is uncertainty. Sometimes COI cannot separate species. I’m not even sure if BOLD has a sample of E. scabrogata. Those could all be gilvipennata. The nearest neighbor to your specimen is another of yours followed by one from Gary McDonald identified as bryanti, sample 2009GM-0034, which looks just like the well marked dark form of gilvipennata. I'm not aware of there being a form of either bryanti or scabrogata with that appearance.

Distribution: E. scabrogata - Southern CA east to Cochise Co, AZ. E. gilvipennata - BC south to southern CA and west to CO and NM. (1)

Names: E. scabrogata and gilvipennata do not appear to have ever been synonymized. Gilvipennata was originally described as a form of scabrogata. There was confusion over the identity of true scabrogata which was sorted out in McDunnough (1949), p. 663 (2). I edited the Info page by changing synonym, Eupithecia scabrogata Pearsall, 1912, to Eupithecia scabrogata form gilvipennata Cassino & Swett, 1922 to make it less confusing. Hope I did that correctly.

Host plant: The Info page listed Arctostaphylos pungens as the host plant and attributed this to McDunnough (1949) but I was not able to find it in that references. Ferris (2018) does list that as the host plant in AZ so I changed it. A. pungens and patula are listed by Wikipia in the same section, the rank between species and subgenus. Gilvipennata also feeds on Arctostaphylos including pungens. I don’t think the host plant can be used to nail the ID.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.