Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes


Butterfly Watching vs ID's

Last week in Florida I entered the following sightings in a Nature Centre's "Sightings" book: Gulf Fritillary, Zebra Longwing, Little Yellow, Cloudless Sulphur, Gray Hairstreak, and Cassius Blue. Half of these were incorrect and one other species was not recorded. Fortunately I got photos, and looking at them today I see that: my Little Yellow appears to be either a Barred or a Dina (will post image later), my Cloudless was a Large Orange, my Gray Hairstreaks were Mallow Scrub Hairstreaks and Martial Scrub Hairstreaks. This incident raises the question of how reliable are id's made purely on sightings? Guess it depends on who is doing the sightings and how familiar he/she is with the local fauna. The unfortunate aspect here is that my recorded "sightings" seem plausible and may be accepted as factual. Thankfully, none of this applies to contributors of BugGuide as we actually collect the specimens via photography.

Retractions..........
Which nature center, Tony? Maybe I can scratch out the earlier names and post your new IDs for you! So far I am finding more moths but fewer dragonflies than you encountered. It has been miserably cool and wet in Central Florida. I think we'll head down to the Glades tomorrow.

 
Thanks Bob
but I think Joel is on the right track; the sightings books are just there to make the tourists feel like they are contributing. It was Bahia Honda State Park in the Lower Keys. My best guess for the yellow is the Dina Yellow.

Watching
I think watching can produce accurate IDs, but as you say being familiar with the fauna is important. I've made plenty of errors, but they only get recorded in my notebook, so I can go back later and correct if necessary. And making such errors really helps me learn, so I do the ID right the next time. I think sightings books are usually taken (or should be) with a fair amount of skepticism. In my experience with birds, some pretty crazy stuff gets reported, and is usually ignored if it's implausible. If your sightings are expected it probably isn't too important that they were wrong, and if they were unexpected and the nature centre staff don't recognize your name and can't verify the sighting I would think they'd ignore the records.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.