Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
 

Register · Log In
HomeGuideID RequestRecentFrassForumsDonateHelp
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
BugGuide Gathering
Pack Forest
Washington State
July 10-12, 2009
Details...

Photos from the 2009 gathering
 
Photos from the 2008 gathering in Tennessee
 
Photos from the 2007 gathering in Minnesota

Home » Forums » General Discussion

More Accurate Image Locations

We want the locations that we enter for images to be as accurate and consistent as possible for data reporting purposes. A short term goal for the data will be to generate range maps, but long term the data may be valuable for sharing with researchers. The sooner we get this right the easier things will be going forward.

As a step in that direction I have made some changes to the image submission form. Instead of entering everything in the location field, there are separate places to specify the state/province and the county. To ease the pain of having to specify this information separately, I've made it possible to specify defaults via your account page. If like most of us your images are usually from the same general area, this should save us all a bit of time on each image submission.

For the existing images everything is still in the original location field. Don't worry about changing the old images. I will take care of that.
login or register to post comments · previous forum topic · next forum topic
Contributed by Troy Bartlett on 20 March, 2005 - 12:42pm

Another Excellent Improvement
Troy, this another example of your excellent software skills going to make BugGuide a better place. Not only have you improved the collecting of new location data, you have gone back retroactively and converted the old data. That undoubtedly took considerable work, since (for example) West Virginia might have been entered in the past as WV, W.V., or West Virginia.

It's exciting that the data we've been collecting will be even more useful with these uniform state and province labels. And it makes the new map improvements possible.

--Stephen

Stephen Cresswell
Buckhannon, WV
www.stephencresswell.com
… Stephen Cresswell, 3 April, 2005 - 1:01pm login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.

Disclaimer: Dedicated naturalists volunteer their time and resources here to provide this service. We strive to provide accurate information, but we are mostly just amateurs attempting to make sense of a diverse natural world. If you need expert professional advice, contact your local extension office.

Contributors own the copyright to and are solely responsible for contributed content.
Click the contributor's name for licensing and usage information.
Everything else copyright © 2003-2009 Iowa State University, unless otherwise noted.

Bugguide is hosted by Iowa State University Entomology.

Printer Friendly Version 		Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Site Map
Contact