Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
BugGuide Gathering
Smoky Mountains
University of Tennessee Biological Field Station
August 8-10, 2008
Details...
 
Photos from the last gathering (Minnesota 2007)

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#150857
Reddish Beetle - Harpalus eraticus

Reddish Beetle - Harpalus eraticus
Brighton, Northumberland, Ontario, Canada
September 15, 2007
Size: 1/2 inch +/-
This beetle seemed to be trying to bury him/her self. Would like to know what kind if it is possible please.

moved to new species page
following ID by Guy Hanley and Peter Messer. Thanks for this one!

Peter, I guess you as an Carabid expert will find more species that can be identified by the learned eye on genus or subfamily levels . . .

 
Thanks, I think?
Confessions and disclaimer by an "expert": Given only distant field photographs and minimal data, I personally find that carabid identification to the most specific level that is still confident (>95% likely) is difficult and risky business. The odds are high that at least a few of my levels of identification for BugGuide will be carried too far and completely wrong! Hopefully someone will notice. We do our best and I, for one, still have much to learn from my mistakes.

Teneral?
I would caution against assuming the thing is red. It might be a teneral that has not achieved full pigmentation yet. Then again, it really could be red:-) You can always test by gently grabbing the insect. If it is softer than normal, it is a teneral.

ground beetle
of Harpalini tribe. Presumably genus Har*palus, but can´t be sure on that.

 
Yes
I agree with Boris, the species that has been out here the last few weeks is Harpalus erraticus

 
Harpalini : Harpalus eraticus
I agree. As this is a new taxon for BG, please make sure that we use original "eraticus" by Say (1823), not "erraticus" on which carabid authorities now agree is an unprevailing-unintentional subsequent missspelling.

 
Thanks
for the name correction, I am just starting to stumble through a collection project that produced a fair amount of carabids, and they are proving to be quite a challenge for me to ID...

 
Thanks to all! I appreciate y
Thanks to all! I appreciate your help.
Naomi

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.