Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Registration
is open for the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2023
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Hexapods (Hexapoda)
»
Insects (Insecta)
»
Grasshoppers, Crickets, Katydids (Orthoptera)
»
Grasshoppers (Caelifera)
»
Short-horned Grasshoppers (Acrididae)
»
Spur-throated Grasshoppers (Melanoplinae)
»
Melanoplini
»
Melanoplus
»
Red-legged Grasshopper (Melanoplus femurrubrum)
Photo#167066
Copyright © 2008
Philippe Moniotte
Grasshopper -
Melanoplus femurrubrum
Boston, Massachusetts, USA
November 13, 2005
A fairly non-descript grasshopper, I think, but perhaps a very common one : I have little or no info on North-American Grasshoppers. I do not remember the size, but I believe it was neither very small nor very large.
Images of this individual:
tag all
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
Philippe Moniotte
on 27 January, 2008 - 1:51pm
Last updated 22 February, 2008 - 2:58pm
Melanoplus femurrubrum probably
Definitely a female Melanoplus, but it is not absolutely certain that it is this species, though I'm fairly sure.
…
David J. Ferguson
, 27 January, 2008 - 8:47pm
login
or
register
to post comments
third picture
The picture does show the red clearly, but - well - that's not that diagnostic, since most of its close relatives can also have red hind tibiae (and occasionally they aren't red on this species). Even so, it does reinforce the impression that it is M. femurrubrum. Females are often not possible to identify with 100% certaintly, at least not without having them in hand and disecting the genitalia (and I'm not sure these parts are well enough documented for even that to help). The rear view of the males is the best (showing cerci, subgenital plate, etc.). Even so, I think I'd go with about 95% (or better) certaintly on this one now, simply because I know the species well.
…
David J. Ferguson
, 28 January, 2008 - 5:33pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Thanks
Again, thank you very much, David, for your elaborate replies.
Cheers
Philippe
…
Philippe Moniotte
, 29 January, 2008 - 12:40am
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.