Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
BugGuide Gathering
Smoky Mountains
University of Tennessee Biological Field Station
August 8-10, 2008
Details...
 
Photos from the last gathering (Minnesota 2007)

Chrysobothris chrysoela...

...I just noticed that the guide page for this species (in the family Buprestidae) is misspelled as "chryseola" - the "o" should come before the "e".
thanx

pronunciation
Does it have four syllables, with the accent on the third? ( kry-so-EE-la )
Or is it three syllables with a silent O? ( kry-SEE-la )
Or... ?

And how is the genus pronounced and accented? ( kry-SOB-oh-thris ) ?

 
Pronunciation...
At the risk of opening a Pandora's box, there are rules for pronunciation of scientific names, but you will get disagreement (sometimes passionate) from entomologists over specific examples because 1) incorrect usage may become "established" as correct, 2) the derivation of a word (and hence its proper pronunciation) may be uncertain, or 3) "that's not how I learned it".

With that disclaimer out of the way, I presume oe to be a dipthong and thus pronounced è (grave accent indicating a long vowel sound). As a result, strict interpretation of the rules would dictate that Chrysobothris chrysoela be pronounced "krì-SÓB-ó-thrís" "krì-SÈ-luh" (acute accent indicating a short vowel sound). This genus, however, is a perfect example of incorrect usage becoming established as "correct". The antepenult syllable should be accented, since the vowel of the penult is short and followed by a mute and the letter l or r (in this case, -thr-), but most people (buprestid specialists included) pronounce it as "krì-sò-BÓTH-rís".

Few entomology texts (or biology texts in general, for that matter) provide any guidance on proper pronunciation of scientific names. However, An Introduction to the Study of Insects, by Borrer, Triplehorn, and Johnson contains an excellent and very readable synopsis of such - I highly recommend it!

p.s. - Nomina Nearctica is rife with spelling and nomenclatural errors. It's okay as a general reference, but I wouldn't rely on it too heavily as a final authority.

p.p.s. - maybe this was way more information than you wanted, but I actually like this kind of stuff!

 
The info page lists the Greek
as omicron eta which we don't think would be a diphthong, but interesting!

 
You're right...
...oe is not a Greek diphthong, thus o and e would be treated as separate syllables. Since latinization places the accent on the antepenult if it is long (as eta is), the pronunciation would be "krì-sò-È-luh".

But that's not how I learned it :-)

 
Did you mean to write...
"Since latinization places the accent on the penult if it is long..." ?

Or did you mean to put the accent on the third-last syllable instead of the second-last?

 
Yes, penult...
...not antipenult.

I seem to have made a mess of this one ;-)

Done
The error comes from the very last person I would expect- but "eo" seems so much more natural than "oe" that the memory substitutes it if you're not careful. What's going to make it doubly hard is sharing that error with Nomina Nearctica...

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.