Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes


Neuroptera allies

Current Taxonomy consensus places both the Raphidiopterans and Megalopterans within separate orders from the Neuropterans. This is reflected in publications like Grimaldi, D. and Engel, M.S. (2005). Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press. and the Tree of Life Project. This should be reflected in Bugguide with Raphidioptera and Megaloptera separate from Neuroptera.

The deed is done.
I'm not sure what the correct taxonomic order for the orders is (although I imagine Raphidioptera and Megaloptera should go right next to Neuroptera), so someone who knows better can fix that.

I transferred all the guide page info from the three suborder pages before making them disappear. In the case of Neuroptera, there may be a little of fine-tuning to be done, since some of the information that was already on that page may refer to Neuroptera in the broader sense. For the time being, I've clarified this by indicating "Neuropterida" for anything that was already on the Neuroptera page before I moved info from Planipennia.

 
Thanks
Thanks for all the work on this Charley!

 
Yes, thanks/sequence of new orders
Yes, thanks for doing that important editorial work. See my comments here under the discussion of the sequence of insect orders. It is clear those three orders should be placed together, so I have done so, following the sequence from the Tree of Life Web. It is really quick to change the sequence of taxonomic orders, so it is no big deal to change to another sequence in the future.

I just tried
to fix this, but it doesn't seem to be possible to simply move suborders to order level. I tried to get around that by tagging the families and moving them to a new order, which worked except the images didn't seem to follow--some quirk in the system where they were left in some kind of no-man's-land. So unless I'm missing something, to do this we would have to tag every single image in Neuroptera and move them to their new orders (and that includes Neuroptera proper, if we want to get rid of the now unnecessary Planipennia suborder). So I've put everything back the way it was for now. Any advice or comments on what to do about this? Is this something (as I asked here) that has to wait for the next version of BugGuide? Or is it something that can be fixed now, but only by John VanDyk?

 
A quirk of Bugguide
If I recall correctly it takes a while for the images to follow and move to the new place. My heart skipped a beat a couple of times when it hapenned but in the end everything turned out alright. Have you checked again?

 
There's nothing to check
because I moved everything back... but I will now try moving just the snakeflies to their own order, then wait a couple of days, and if the images catch up with the move, I will then go ahead and take care of the other groups. Thanks for your input.

 
Well...
The current status is that no images show up in Raphidioptera; they all still show up in Raphidioidea, even though the families are gone. But if you click on the images, it shows that they are in fact in Raphidioptera. So we don't have to worry about the images disappearing, and I guess now we can just wait and find out how long the lag time is before the thumbnails show up where they're supposed to.

 
Success!
Apparently it takes an hour or two. Now I just have to individually move the several images of larvae that haven't been ID'd to family. I'll go ahead and elevate the other suborders.

Recent Publication
Here is a Recent Publication on B. C. Snakeflies which uses the Order level Classification.

first discussed

 
Never realy resolved
From the looks of it This wasn't actually resolved, plus it is a little over two years old now, and splitting is the more accepted now

 
Splitting...?
Splitting from what? Into different orders? Suborders? I'm familiar enough with the neuropteroids to look for those as families, orders, or suborders, so it doesn't really matter to me, but I 'am' in favor of keeping up-to-date, which Bugguide can do far better online than different editions of textbooks, etc:-)

 
Re Splitting
It would be the removal of Alderfies and snakeflies from the Lacewing order. Then listing them, as is currently accepted, a the full orders Megaloptera for Alderflies & Dobsonflies; and Raphidioptera for the Snakeflies.

 
Ok.
No objections here:-)

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.