Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#184394
Tasgius? - Tasgius melanarius

Tasgius? - Tasgius melanarius
Mill Pond, Richmond Hill, York Region, Ontario, Canada
May 17, 2008
Size: 17 mm
I nabbed this rove while it was crossing a sidewalk. It is missing its right fore leg; at least I discovered just after shooting this photo.
I suspect this species specialize, or at least prefer to prey upon, wood lice. I recall having successfully reared one of these many years back, from a sickle-jawed larva which accepted no other prey item than Oniscids.

Images of this individual: tag all
Tasgius? - Tasgius melanarius Rove Beetle - Tasgius melanarius

Moved
Moved from Tasgius ater.

T. ater
Nice to have this identified. I've always wanted to know what these common staphs are, having seen them around since childhood. Maybe I should look for melanarius too (looking at range data I know they are in the area). Where is this 'tooth' anyway, that I should be looking for in ater?

 
The tooth I needed to ID ater
The tooth I needed to ID ater is located on the inner margin of the mandible. Ater belongs to a different subgenus than melan*arius, which has toothed mandibles. Melan*arius belongs to a subgenus with sickle mandibles (thin, toothless blades). Both are common in the Guelph area, although ater is much rarer and is outnumbered by the other species by about 5 to 1 in the guelph collection.

Cheers,
Adam

 
melanarius, after all?
Hi Adam, I've posted a second image showing just the head and jaws. I happened to spread this specimen with the jaws open, so these are in clear view. They don't seem to have teeth, so could it be that your initial suspicion was right?

 
You're right about those mand
You're right about those mandibles...I wonder what that toothlike thing was in the other pic? Unquestionably melanarius.

Cheers,
Adam

 
Maybe a palp...
or perhaps the angle. I was getting confused myself, so went and double-checked the specimen itself. At least now we have a clear image of the mandibles of this species!

It is...
Tasgius, looks like melanarius

Cheers,
Adam

 
Thanks again!
Since you aren't an editor, you won't be able to see the full-sized image. Would you like me to send you a larger version of the image so you can have a better look at the details?

 
I see a tooth on the enlarged photo
...which means it must be ater.

Cheers,
Adam

 
Sure, I'll see what I can do
Sure, I'll see what I can do with some extra detail.

Adam

How large is too large?
I'm just wondering, is there a size limit (either file or pixel size, or both) to the files I can submit? This was originally 3794 x 1896 at 3.10 MB, and I was told that the image is too big. I have resized it to 2000 at the longest side (still a very high pixel count), so at least the editors can see it expanded. I certainly understand, though, that even if the image is any larger, it may not necessarily lead to a better ID.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.