Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
BugGuide Gathering
Smoky Mountains
University of Tennessee Biological Field Station
August 8-10, 2008
 
Photos from the gathering
 
Photos from the 2007 gathering in Minnesota

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#187575
female adult wolf spider with brood/Hogna aspersa - Hogna aspersa - female

female adult wolf spider with brood/Hogna aspersa - Hogna aspersa - Female
fentress County, Tennessee, USA
June 2, 2008
Size: bdy+brda.1.2"w/legsa.2.4"
is size of abdomen normal or does it indicate she is gravid? i can not be sure the individual is the same, but the day after this picture was taken, i saw another same-species female with brood some 400 feet down the road from where my 6-2-8 photograph was taken. very active no? another interesting matter: my p.c. laptop monitor renders this spider's colors quite differently-it tends toward grey rather than brown and shows the area surrounding the babies as a weaker brown. the computer used to archive photographs usually conveys original camera colors precisely. but in this case my mental recollection is that the p. c. is spot on and the work computer off. so, what are the true colors of this lady? also: does anyone know of a web site which will allow species search based on coloration, size, markings?

> does anyone know of a web s
> does anyone know of a web site which will allow species search
> based on coloration, size, markings?

"BugGuide". But unfortunately BG is not set up for key wording, so almost one does this and you are reduced to browsing (taxonomically, if you already have a hunch).

Identifying spiders by color and markings has its limits. It works well for a few species; genus is often possible, and almost always family, I believe. But just to give you an idea, published taxonomic references are not even included in the World Spider Catalog unless they include an image of the sex organs of at least one gender. And there is a great deal of variation, particularly from one specimen to the next.

-Kevin

Wolf spider
family Lycosidae. Hard for me to tell how big her abdomen is when it's covered with multiple layers of spiderlings. :-)

The one 400 feet down the road is most likely a different one.

What say me? All cameras, monitors, LCD panels and computers record and display colors inaccurately unless properly calibrated.

If you like to be picky, use a grey-card reference during shooting so you can have a reference when processing, and purchase and use a colorimeter so you can calibrate the display on each machine you use for editing. I've used a $100 ColorVision Spyder (yes, Spyder :-) for several years now and have been happy with it. Search Amazon and you'll find a ColorVision Spyder2 for $126. It will probably fulfill most color needs.

FWIW, the colors here look fine on my calibrated display. No idea if they are accurate, but they look fine to me. I've seen much much worse.

 
colors
lots of savory information in but a few words, jay barnes.

i'll look into the spyder.

regarding 'grey reference': at camera i set white balance manually before a shoot using a white card. are you saying use a grey-colored object instead, or is your drift otherwise?

also: great that your monitor shows what seem to be true colors; but what colors are displayed?

imageminder

 
White or grey,
either is fine. Even gray will work. :-) As long as there is no color tone present. So, a sheet of paper left in sunlight for an hour wouldn't be good.

Loading this image into CS2 I see more brown than grey. In a web browser, which doesn't recognize color profiles, the colors are slightly washed out. Configuring your camera to use sRGB color space instead of Adobe RGB will help remedy this minor difference.

Something else I just noticed, you probably shouldn't stop your lens down so far. Most SLR camera lenses are sharpest at around f/8, and at that focal length I would expect f/11 to provide enough depth-of-field for this subject. It's definitely worth your time to at least experiment; I suspect you are losing much detail due to diffraction.

 
color values
***

again hello mr. barnes,

i'm still on a chase for species. several sites inform me that there are some 2.2 to 2.5k worldwide, 50-100 here in the united states.

i'll try a wider aperture and see what that yields.

as for sRGB and adobe: i've used both and for my purposes adobe renders truer values and requires less fiddling.

thanks!

imageminder

***

 
Yes
at last count, 2324 described species worldwide. About 240 in North America. I can't find a state list for Tennessee, but just to give you an idea, Ohio has 47 species, Alabama 80, Arkansas 63. A short list of state lists is located here

You won't get a positive ID to species from this photo unless the very few markings visible happen to be distinctive. A genus ID might not even be possible.

 
species
***
so many species-incredible no?

well, having gone through lycosidae here at bug guide and considering the markings on the legs, the light-colored and thin stripe between the eyes and the 'filler' between the babies, i put this lady at Hogna aspersa.

(whew! says he after spending quite a stretch of time in front of his computer screen.)

thanks again mr. barnes.
***

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.