Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#191666
Black Plant Bug - Plagiognathus longirostris

Black Plant Bug - Plagiognathus longirostris
Beaver Creek, Richmond Hill (N43º52'15.3"W079º23'50.6"elev.183m), York Region, Ontario, Canada
June 12, 2008
Size: 3 mm
Swept from Wild Grape.

Moved
Moved from Plagiognathus.

Moved
Moved from Plant Bugs.

Sorry, it's not a Phylus...
The body shape, particularly the pronotum shape is very different from Phylus. The lateral margin of the pronotum of this bug is somewhat rounded, while that of Phylus is almost rectilinear. Furthermore, the ratio of length to width of the pronotum is very different between two species.

So, my previous ID was wrong.

Instead, i believe now it is a Plagiognathus species, in particular, P. longirostris. According to Schuh, P. longirostris is recognized by "nearly black, elongate body (fig. 9), entirely pale white legs (fig. 9), pale antennae with segment 1 dark only at extreme base (fig. 17)," etc.

The linked paper gives a key to Plagiognathus species, photos of all species, and schematic figures of antennae as well as the description of species, so you may confirm my new suggestion.

 
Your photo is so excellent that i can easily ID it.
^^

 
Schuh's key is faulty for this species
You have to watch out when using his key for P. modestus vs P. longirostris. Weirdly, the key in Schuh (p. 21, couplet 4b) mentions P. longirostris having an entirely pale first antennal segment, but his diagram of the antennae on p. 109, photo on p. 101 and descriptions on pp. 16 and 155 all show and mention the dark base. This confused me considerably! I've no doubt this is mentioned in a later issue of the AMNHB as an erratum, but of course it isn't in the pdf copy of the original publication.

It's better to have a time...
It's somewhat different from Phylus...

looks like Phylus
^^

 
It may be Phylus coryli...

 
must be it -- nice job!
*

 
That looks like it!
Thanks for the ID, WonGun.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.