Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#231842
Prioninae?

Prioninae?
Zion National Park, Utah, USA
July 22, 2008
Size: 5 cm

Images of this individual: tag all
Prioninae? Prioninae?

Moved
Moved from Longhorned Beetles to Macrotomini, the common denominator for the two IDs Ted proposed below. Let me know if this would be better placed at subfamily level, or somewhere else...

 
After looking at it again...
...I can't see how it could be anything other than Archodontes melanopus serrulatus. It's holding the mandibles more horizontally than I would expect for this species but otherwise has the general appearance of that species, with the pronotal shape matching subspecies serrulatus (known from the southern U.S. west of the Mississippi River west to Arizona). The short 3rd antennomere excludes Strongylaspis (which is restricted in the U.S. to southern Florida), and the lack of carinae on top of the mandibles and obtuse antennal tubercles exclude the widespread Mallodon dasystomus, Nothopleurus (west Texas to Arizona and southern California), Neomallodon (Arizona), and Stenodontes (southern Florida). Utah is an interesting distributional record - to my knowledge none of the Macrotomini have been recorded from the state. I don't suppose you have the specimen?

Hmm...
In the photo you added, the mandibles don't look nearly so carinate on top as in this photo, and the antennal tubercles don't look so acute. That would suggest Archodontes melanopus, although that species usually holds its mandibles more vertically.

I suggest leaving it here for a bit and see if anyone else chimes in.

Looks like...
...Mallodon dasystomus (horizontal mandibles, not retracted basally), but Utah seems an odd distributional record.

 
I've added
a detail from the only other shot I have of this individual, although I don't imagine it gives you any new information.

Would these images best be placed at species, genus, or subfamily level?

Moved
Moved from Beetles.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.