Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#239204
Leiodid - Catopocerus

Leiodid - Catopocerus
Ozark-St. Francis NF; White Rock WMA, Franklin County, Arkansas, USA
April 17, 2008
Size: 1.2mm
Sifted from flood debris accumulated on bank of W Fleming Creek; hardwood dominated forest.

All pics taken with automontage system. Actual montaging done with CombineZM.

Catopocerus?

Images of this individual: tag all
Leiodid - Catopocerus Leiodid - Catopocerus Leiodid - Catopocerus

Dr Peck elaborates:
"a new species of Catopocerus we have from Missouri, Arkansas and east Texas, in process of description"

 
Jeff-- to clarify:
the above comment (Peck's update) was posted by me, i was just posting Mikes' stuff logged in under his name; sorry, i mismanage accounts, but who doesn't these days

 
multiple personalities?
Thanks v. I recently received an email from Dr. Peck stating same. I'm heading back down to Arkansas tonight to test out my newly built sifter. Hopefully will get more.

opinion of Stewart Peck:
"It is CERTAIN that the one listed as Catopocerus is that genus, but we are presently working on Arkansas specimens to confirm that they are a new species."

 
Is this another first image of a new species for bugguide?
Was the study of Arkansas specimens precipitated by this find by any chance?

 
?
I was not aware that anyone was looking at AR specimens. At this point nobody has seen my specimen except me and bugguide visitors.

 
So Stewart Peck obviously has his own specimens.
Just looking for a little excitement re new spp. :-)

 
they may have AR material of their own, can't they?
i e-mailed Dr Peck last Thursday, and got his reply an hour ago

 
sorry...
I was attempting to imply by my reply that this find had not precipitated the study of AR specimens and that other specimens had. The question mark title probably should have said 'probably not' or such.

Moved

Wow!
Didn't know leiodids came in that size.

 
smaller
I have some round ones that I think are smaller than this. I'll eventually get to them.

looks like you're right... wonderful beast!
my impression after looking at MCZ types is that they all differ from your gal in several important ways: all three have [1] beaded pronotal and elytral margins; [2] basal abdominal sternite deeply protruding between metacoxae; and [3] striated elytra. Yours may belong to a different subgenus though. Fabulous find!
[added 1/23/09] genus confirmed by Ainsley Seago seago@nature.berkeley.edu

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.