Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#242957
Vertical tubes in pond sediment - Phylocentropus

Vertical tubes in pond sediment - Phylocentropus
Belchertown - Scarborough Brook Conservation Area, Hampshire County, Massachusetts, USA
June 21, 2008
Size: 3mm wide, up to 54mm long
These tubes were sticking up from the sediment at the edge of a pond. I was holding off on posting these images because I thought they were probably from some kind of worm, but several annelid experts have looked at them and didn't think so. The possibilities I'm aware of are:
-tubifex worms (I don't know if they get this big or would have a coating of sediment like this)
-Phylocentropus caddisflies (these tubes should be branched, and in running water)
-chironomids (the tubes I'm familiar with are soft and attached to rocks, not tough, rigid, and sticking up vertically like this... but I've read some vague descriptions that make chironomids seem like the best candidate nonetheless)
-tipulids (apparently Antocha and others make tubes covered with debris or small stones, but I don't know if they would stick up vertically)
Any thoughts are much appreciated!

Images of this individual: tag all
Vertical tubes in pond sediment - Phylocentropus Vertical tubes in pond sediment - Phylocentropus

Moved
Moved from Caddisflies.

Thanks Lloyd--I have ruled out all the other options to my satisfaction, and this seems like a reasonable match.

A vote for Phylocentropus
I'm not very familiar with other orders that might build similar structures, but I think that Phylocentropus is a pretty strong candidate. Per the size issue discussed below, although these larvae can be fairly long, they are also extremely slender. For what it's worth, you can compare your images with the tubes and associated larvae pictured here.

Moved to Trichoptera...
...in hopes of getting an opinion from one of the caddisfly connoisseurs.

Phylocentropus?
So, according to Wiggins (2004), Phylocentropus live in "bottom sediments of lakes and depositional zones of streams." (So edge of pond seems fine)

Also, it sounds like these could be broken off old side-branches of a tube sustem:
"A bulbous portion of the side-branching tube encloses a sack-shaped filter net of silken threads randomly arranged. Extensive systems of tubes with more than one bulbous side branch are often found in the sediments (Figure 12), but usually only one is functional and the others are sealed off at the junction with the main tube." And the tubes in figure 12 look a lot like yours, the bulbous portion being the base of the side branch.

 
...
Yeah, I remember that those are supposed to have a bulbous portion--I'm not sure why I didn't mention that above. I wish I had found intact branches to confirm... The way these tubes were all roughly vertical and about the same length didn't seem to match--his illustration shows the bulbous-bottomed branches coming out at an angle and just barely peeking above the surface--but there doesn't seem to be anything else that comes close to this. They sure aren't worm tubes, and midges don't seem to make anything this substantial. The fact that Phylocentropus can be found at the edges of lakes is encouraging.

 
The texture seems identical,
The texture seems identical, and Wiggins' newer drawings show old buried branches, presumably because the surface level shifts (the old buried branches used to be exposed?), so it seems like the height and angles probably vary...

 
Does he say anything about size?
Does 3 mm wide seem reasonable?

 
no
it seems pretty small for a caddisfly, perhaps the tubes you found are all early instars that start off with one unbranched tube, and would be smaller. Wiggins describes the larvae of the family (Dipseudopsidae) as "long and slender ranging in length up to about 20mm." Measuring dimensions on his drawing and scaling down, that would make a max diameter of the larva 2mm. So maybe those are the right size.

Also, "The total length of a tube system may extend up to some 16cm and is perhaps longer still." - I think thats if you add up the lengths of all the branches.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.