Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#252349
Rove Beetle - Quedius curtipennis

Rove Beetle - Quedius curtipennis
Lacey (near Olympia), Thurston County, Washington, USA
January 2, 2009

Images of this individual: tag all
Rove Beetle - Quedius curtipennis Rove Beetle - Quedius curtipennis Rove Beetle - Quedius curtipennis Rove Beetle - Quedius curtipennis Rove Beetle - Quedius curtipennis

Moved
Moved from Quedius.

Likely Q. curtipennis/fuliginosus - the first known from Pacific Northwest as early as 1939 [Majka & Smetana 2007.
Safe discrimination of the species by genitalia only, right.

Hmm
This is indeed Quedius (subgenus Quedius). Because the scutellum looks impunctate, this is Quedius fuliginosus. A similar species has completely pale antennae with less bulgy eyes, while yours has its first antennomere dark on top and very bulgy eyes. This species was a newly recorded introduction for NA recently from maritime Canada. If your scutellum is indeed impunctate it represents a new record for the US. If you are interested, I could dissect the specimen at the Guelph Insect Collection (Canada) and report back.

Adam

 
impunctate scutella and dark antennomeres
Looking at the closeups of the antennae, it looks like at least the first two or three antennomeres have dark spots on top. Does that change anything?

I tried to include a couple of the shots from different angles that show the scutellum better, but they weren't the best lighting or focus. :(

 
I wish you could...
but I didn't keep the specimen. I will keep my eyes open for additional specimens. If I find one, I'll be happy to send it along.

I took quite a few pictures, and these are definitely shrunk down. I will try to post a better closeup of the scutellum. If any additional pictures would help, please let me know.

 
Hi Kevin, According to a
Hi Kevin,

According to a recent paper, the second and third antennomeres are completely dark in fuliginosus and pale in the other similar species. Yours seems to be in-between. It must be either of these two species as your scutellum is definitely impunctate (others have many punctures). A perfect dorsal shot of the head would help a bit to see the eyes better. I think the only way to resolve this one is a specimen to dissect.

Adam

looks like Quedius to me
pls don't forget to measure your catch -- may save a lot of effort to those who provide IDs

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.