Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Registration
is open for the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2023
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Chelicerates (Chelicerata)
»
Arachnids (Arachnida)
»
Mites and Ticks (Acari)
»
Acariformes
»
Trombidiformes
»
Prostigs (Prostigmata)
»
Eupodina
»
Eupodoidea
»
Earth Mites (Penthaleidae)
»
Blue Oat Mites (Penthaleus)
»
winter grain mites (Penthaleus major)
Photo#256523
Copyright © 2009
Scott Justis
Mite ID -
Penthaleus major
Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA
March 4, 2009
Size: ~1.5mm (body)
On the run!
Images of this individual:
tag all
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
Scott Justis
on 4 March, 2009 - 6:57pm
Last updated 5 August, 2009 - 2:45pm
Amazing photos! What is your secret?
Hi Scott, I have been drooling over your photos on BugGuide. Do you mind if I ask what your secret is?
I have taken many shots of this mite species and none compare with yours. I cannot figure out why I am unable to get the detail you are getting while using comparable equipment. I use a Canon 5D Mark IV, MP-E 65, both Canon extension tubes (EF12 & EF25), MT26-EX-RT twin flash. Since I can't figure out how to embed a thumbnail in a comment I have included a dropbox link below to some of my mite photos. The settings for the 5K5A2728.jpg photo were 1/200, f/9.0, ISO 500 and all the other photos were taken at similar settings.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/mwihidg9bkhrbj7/AACe_DcrvhKP-K6diUdsBbMha?dl=0
I would appreciate any tips you can give me.
Thank you,
Wendy Duncan
…
Wendy Duncan
, 31 January, 2021 - 9:48pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Moved
Moved from
Earth Mites
.
…
Kevin Hall
, 5 August, 2009 - 2:45pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Moved
Moved from
Erythraeoidea
.
…
John F. Carr
, 4 April, 2009 - 5:04pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Moved
Moved from
Mites and Ticks
.
…
Scott Justis
, 10 March, 2009 - 2:13pm
login
or
register
to post comments
erythraeoidea
Wow- great pictures! i love the droplet of water that's clinging to its back! This is in the superfamily Erythraeoidea, possibly an erythraeid, but i'm not 100% sure.
…
Kaitlin Uppstrom
, 10 March, 2009 - 1:53pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Penthaleidae
Not erythraeoid... this is a eupodoid mite almost certainly in the family Penthaleidae, which is a new BG family. I think penthaleids have a dorsal anus (at least some of them do), and it's possible that droplet is actually poop! Cool! Anyway, they're plant feeders... we're getting them on young winter wheat starting about this time of year. Some can be major pests in Australia (red-legged earth mite).
S. Justis.... amazing... simply amazing. You even captured the slight iridescence on the idiosoma! Beautiful.
…
Ray Fisher
, 3 April, 2009 - 10:32pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Thanks Ray!
The drop on its back could very well be an excretion. In the first image, it actually appears to be smaller. I will request a new page.
…
Scott Justis
, 4 April, 2009 - 9:16am
login
or
register
to post comments
Thank You Kaitlin
I will put these images in Erythraeoidea since you're not 100% sure about the mites status as an erythraeid.
…
Scott Justis
, 10 March, 2009 - 2:12pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Mite ID Photos
Sorry I can't help with the ID. Fantastic photos. What camera, lens, aperture did you use?
…
lreid
, 4 March, 2009 - 9:15pm
login
or
register
to post comments
MPE-65?
I have a hard enough time keeping up with mites at only 1:1 magnification.
…
John F. Carr
, 4 March, 2009 - 8:54pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Ireid, John...
I was using a set of Kenko extension tubes (12, 20 and 32mm) with my MPE-65 lens on a 40D body. An MT-24 twin flash is used and provides more than enough power. For this particular mite, I had the MPE set at between 2-3x with the extension tubes on. Aperture was f/8
Fully extended, I estimate a total of about 8x for the really tiny mites etc. I use an aperture of f/5 to f/6.3 usually.
I had to shoot about 30 frames to get these few good ones as this little fellow was constantly on the move.
Thanks for the kind words!
…
Scott Justis
, 4 March, 2009 - 11:31pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Magnification
I read that the focal length of the MPE-65 at close focus shortens to 40mm. The full stack of extension tubes should give you an extra 1.7 additive factor (68mm/40mm), not multiplicative, for 6.7:1.
…
John F. Carr
, 11 March, 2009 - 7:35pm
login
or
register
to post comments
I measured magnification increments...
on the lens barrel and added the length of the ext. tubes to it and came up with around 7.7x. This might be wrong because there may be some internal lens movement that I cannot see when going from 1x to 5x.
…
Scott Justis
, 13 March, 2009 - 11:18am
login
or
register
to post comments
Sheesh
You know, it's bad enough that you've got that MPE-65 going (Kevin, do not covet thy neighbor's lens. Do not covet thy neighbor's lens.) But then you just *have* to throw extension tubes on it also??
Beautiful as always, my friend. *sigh*
…
Kevin Hall
, 7 March, 2009 - 9:51am
login
or
register
to post comments
I found a nearly new...
set of these for a great price, so I couldn't resist. Fellow Bug Guider David Reed uses them and I was impressed with his results.
Thanks Kevin!
…
Scott Justis
, 7 March, 2009 - 6:45pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.