Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#309637
Lady Beetle - Mulsantina picta

Lady Beetle - Mulsantina picta
Middlebury, Addison County, Vermont, USA
July 22, 2009
Size: 4.5mm

nice to know at last for sure -- thanks, Don

Mulsantina picta
Jason is the winner. This is the orange form, whose featureless orange elytra are shared with at least two other genera. When the underside is examined, the yellow markings of metasternum, metepisterna, and the pronotal venter are only found in this species. For me the underside is the best way to separate these, and does make me wonder about the other specimens in bugguide that look like this.

 
I'll start looking...
The pronotum certainly is distinctive. If I find other dorsal-only photos of beetles that look like this under H*armonia and A*dalia, and there's no associated info ruling Mulsantina out, I'll put them directly under Coccinellidae, treating them as "unidentified" rather than risking "mis-identified."

Moved
I dropped off the specimen to Don the other day. He should be able to confirm the species.

 
any word on this critter?
Just noticed the posts here again and wondered if there was any news on the ID.

why not Adalia bipunctata?
see, e.g., showing very similar trends in both pronotal and head pattern. [Remind Don about this one, too...]

Mulsantina looks good
There's only 4 species of Mulsantina listed in Neartica, and the UNH site only lists the 2 already in the guide. I dropped the specimen off for Don Chandler, so hopefully it will get identified.

Just a guess here but my non
Just a guess here but my non proffessional oppinion would say Genus Mulsantina. The pronotum looks pretty distinctive to that Genus.


With small variations.

 
V is likely correct, but Gord
V is likely correct, but Gordon does mention that Mulsantina Picta is very variable on the elytron.

Gordon : "Diagnosis. Length 3.32 to 5.31 mm, width 2.24 to 3.98 mm. Color yellow except head with black spot on each side of clypeus, spot narrowly connected to black vertex; pronotum with black, median, M-shaped mark, lateral spot connected to M-shaped mark; elytron extremely variable from heavily maculate to immaculate (Fig. 682 c-e). Male genitalia as in Figure 683 a-c. Female genitalia as in Figure 683 e.

Discussion. The elytral color pattern is extremely variable, but the pronotal markings are quite constant and afford an easy means of recognition."

 
and you win!
Of all the suggestions, yours was proved by examining the specimen - good job, I was stumped by this one!

 
written before H. axyridis really invaded, though
H. axyridis and its W or M marking were a minor side note in Gordon's 1985 work, the species has spread like crazy since then. I think any statement about another species being reliably ID'd by a W or M marking isn't as reliable now as it once was.

(Not that I'm saying this is H. axyridis, just that confident statements about pronota with M's and W's can't be made as confidently anymore.)

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.