Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#33756
Birdwing Grasshopper ovipositing - Schistocerca rubiginosa - female

Birdwing Grasshopper ovipositing - Schistocerca rubiginosa - Female
Jupiter Ridge Natural Area, Palm Beach County, Florida, USA
September 29, 2005
Size: ~4 cm
Identification from "Grasshoppers of Florida" (1), p. 123.

interesting
These gray Florida specimens certainly have a distinctive "look" about them, but I agree that S. rubiginosa is correct, and I just commented on two more like this one to bring them all under the same heading.

Moved

It's Schistocerca Rubiginosa
I'm sure of it.

 
I'll move it...
...but, I don't know who you are (credential-wise) BirdwingFan:)

Your bio page doesn't say anything – are you an hopper-expert?

 
To answer your question, I am
To answer your question, I am not an expert though I have put a lot of time into studying this genus. I have run into a number of Rubiginosas recently, and one of its color variations resembles this one. Also the fact that it is on a beach and is larger than Damnifica makes me believe it is Rubiginosa.

These are tough!
This looks a bit different from the Mischevious Birdwings seen in North Carolina:



One of my references, Helfer (1) mentions another subspecies found from South Carolina to Florida: "more compressed and slender and usually thickly sprinkled with tiny dark specks and represents the subspecies calidior Rehn and Hebard." Perhaps that's what this is. Pronotal ridge is supposed to be distinctive in S. damnifica, I don't see it well in your photo, but it's not a high ridge, even at just the right angle. Also, the wings look a bit long--they are supposed to extend just past the abdomen in S. damnifica. Hard to say with the abdomen curved down a bit in yours--ovipositing? (Yours is a female, the ones from NC look to perhaps be the more compact males.) Tough, tough. Capinera (2) says that both S. alutacea and S. obscura sometimes lack the distinctive stripe. I don't know, I'm just trying to start learning some of this genus.

Patrick Coin
Durham, North Carolina

 
Good points
Hey Patrick,

I can see what you mean, these are tough! (and I am certainly no expert!)

Let's see..."Grasshoppers of Florida" (1), p.120 mentions that: "The base color of of the hind tibiae of S. obscura is purplish or blackish rather than the brown of S. alutacea."

...which I don't see here, (nor do I see that prominent dorsal stripe) so we can probably eliminate that from the list leaving it between S. alutacea and S. damnifica. And I agree with you, the pronotal ridge does not seem that distinct in this particular shot. But I don't recall this individual being as large as Capinera indicates S. alutacea either...

Perhaps we can get advice from an expert?

 
Comments on this one?

Looks to be the same as yours but definitely too big to be S. damnifica

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.