Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
BugGuide Gathering
Smoky Mountains
University of Tennessee Biological Field Station
August 8-10, 2008
Details...
 
Photos from the last gathering (Minnesota 2007)

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#35608
Arhopalus foveicollis? - Arhopalus

Arhopalus foveicollis? - Arhopalus
Blacksburg, Montgomery County, Virginia, USA
August 10, 2005
Size: 22mm
Found this Cerambycid in front of the Grocery Store back in August. Unfortunately, I didn't have my camera at the time, so this is the pinned specimen. It is in the subfamily Aseminae.

ID'ed using Yanega's book, but I am looking for a confirmation.

Moved
I will move it to genus Arhopalus for now until there is a confirmation of the species.

Arhopalus at least
I'm sure it's either A. foveicollis or A. rusticus obsoletus. I don't seem to have either to compare it to, though. So, looking at Yanega, there are a few things I see. The elytral ridges in yours don't seem to be quite as pronounced as the A. foveicollis in Yanega, but that could just be the angle and lighting of the photos. Also, the proportions of the antennal in yours (looking mainly at the third segment and the total length) seem to look more like Yanega's A. rusticus obsoletus, but that could be a variation between specimens or sex. I looked hard at the pictures I guess hoping it would pop out like one of those 3D poster things to get an idea about the size of the pronotal depressions, but that's hard to really get a gauge on. The eyes in your picture don't seem to be hairy, though. If that's true, I think I'd say Arhopalus foveicollis. Anyway, that's my attempt at looking like I'm giving an answer without actually commiting to anything.

 
Confusion!
Yeah, I know how you feel. I sat for about an hour comparing the two, and the only thing that I could come up with is the lack of hairy eyes. Thus leading me to believe that it was A. foveicollis.

 
I think A. rusticus
I have a foveicollis from Maine and it really doesn't look like your beetle. The elytral ridges and pronotal sculpturing are quite prominent and not likely to go away based on the lighting, camera angle, etc. Also the ranges are different. Foveicolis is basically a northern bug although I guess it could come down the Appalachians. A checklist of Maryland Cerambycidae by Charlie Staines (Maryland Entomologist, Volume 3, Number 1, April 1987) gives no records for foveicollis in Maryland so I bet it would be rare in VA if there at all. Rusticus on the other hand was listed from three Maryland counties.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.