this thing does work, after all -- i mean, BG? eh?

one big reason is that someone named v has connected our vast numbers of contributors with a network of experts generously willing to donate some time to the site. :)

the only reason they are is because the project obviously has an enormous potential. i can think of many ways the academic taxonomy can benefit from it, as the experts [a] get relived of tedious routine IDing common, trivial bugs -- now that BG handles a large chunk of this flow; [b] see interesting things pop up and get material for study from unexpected sources; [c] have unprecedented outreach that allows to educate the enthusiasts and direct their effort towards un[der]explored areas/habitats/taxa; &c....

Ken--
i bounced to you the notes we exchanged with Dr. Sweet re: your fine bugs; pls get in touch w/him: he sounds more than eager to study the specimens

I was hoping this might be something interesting! :) Seriously - you are the real BG hero, v - the curator par excellence of our virtual collection!