Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#413815
California tube trapdoor spider - Calisoga longitarsis - male

California tube trapdoor spider - Calisoga longitarsis - Male
Napa County, California, USA
March 7, 2010
Another Bug Guide First.

Images and ID provided by Dr. Lenny Vincent, Fullerton College. Fullerton, Calif.

Why Brachythele? He explains...

"I choose to use Brachythele not Calisoga since C. longitarsis was not published by Bentzein, and Platnick uses B. longitarsis in the newly published World Spider Catalog V11.O (http://research.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog/NEMESIIDAE.html)"

This stuff is way above my pay grade!
...Ron

Images of this individual: tag all
California tube trapdoor spider - Calisoga longitarsis - male California tube trapdoor spider  - Calisoga longitarsis - male California tube trapdoor spider - Calisoga longitarsis - male California tube trapdoor spider - Calisoga longitarsis - male California tube trapdoor spider - Calisoga longitarsis - male California tube trapdoor spider  - Calisoga longitarsis - male

Moved

Moved

Nice
Nice, Ron. For the sake of simplicity and uniformity we follow the World Spider Catalog (with a few exceptions, whose reasons I've once again forgotten).

I have the following note in my records: "NB. Platnick (2006) does not accept the transfer of C. longitarsus to the genus Calisoga for procedural reasons*. He lists it under its previous genus name, Brachythele. However, it is widely accepted that Brachythele is an old-world genus, and that North American spiders described as Brachythele are correctly placed in Calisoga." [Sorry, I don't know where this citation came from.]

So I, too, will defer to those here who have a better sense of how this ship runs.

-K

* The "procedural reasons" most likely being this part: "since C. longitarsis was not published by Bentzein"

 
Beautiful photos! Kevin is
Beautiful photos!

Kevin is correct about the procedural issues. Brachythele "Calisoga" longitarsis is the common species across most of northern California. Unfortunately, an abundance of descriptions have led to a multiplicity of names, and until a revisionary work is published (not just in someone's thesis or dissertation) the proposed revisions are not officially recognized. Bentzien's 1976 dissertation thoroughly explored the natural history and systematics of these spiders and clearly showed that they are different from the European Brachythele and that there were only one or two species (not five) in the family. While the research he did is accepted by most arachnologists, because he didn't publish it, the old taxonomy is still "officially" recognized.

 
Brachythele vs. Calisoga
I remember talking to B. J. Kaston shortly after the publication of his 3rd ed. (1978) of How to Know the Spiders. B. J. was a perfectionist and stickler for protocol. He was very upset having changed Brachythele to Calisoga in his 3rd ed. in induced anticipation that Bentzien was going to publish.

 
I believe this is Lenny's best series to date.
Photos are larger, more numerous, and benefitting from a new lens.

 
I agree
these photos are great.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.