Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#417273
Ichneumon - Pseudoplatylabus townesi - female

Ichneumon - Pseudoplatylabus townesi - Female
Groton, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, USA
June 26, 2010
Size: 8mm

Moved
Moved from Pseudoplatylabus new-species.
Brandon, thanks for the identification. This does look like it's the same species as yours.

P. townesi
I'm not sure why Bob Carlson says that the two known Pseudoplatylabus species in the Nearctic are basically black. As noted in Heinrich (1962), P. townesi is mainly ferruginous with white markings which is what I believe this is. For comparison, here's a specimen I posted which was compared with specimens from the USU (formerly AEI) collection:https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/62848709.

Moved
Moved from New Species.

Moved
Moved from Ichneumon Wasps.

 
Reproducing Bob Carlson's com
Reproducing Bob Carlson's comments (2010) from the now-defunct new-species page for context. Some of these notes may be useful to retain for Pseudoplatylabus violentus (reference images).

"The two known Nearctic species of this genus are basically black in coloration. The genus seems to agree well structurally with this red and white female, but the definite placement of the species in Pseudoplatylabus rather than in a new genus would depend upon the structure of the male flagellum. Hopefully, specimens of the male can be found. It seems all the more remarkable that an undescribed species with such a striking striking coloration was collected in a place relatively near where the late Ichneumoninae specialist Gerd Heinrich lived and collected in Maine."

Moved
I'd think this to be Cryptinae if it weren't for the apparent lack of notauli. [But now that I have the specimen, I find it to be Ichneumoninae, apparently an undescribed genus].

Moved from Braconids and Ichneumons.

 
Interesting
I was wondering if there were undescribed genus in the Ichneumons, after you wrote that only 35% of the family is believed to be described. Could there even be subfamilies that are undescribed, and what are the chances of any of these undescribed specimens being described?

 
-
Additional subfamilies and lesser supergeneric groups will likely be recognized as more is known about the hosts and habits of ichneumonids. This would presumably have to come, in large part, as a result of work on the biology of the host species, but rearing and life history studies aren't very popular any more (one can't do that kind of work with a computer), so I wouldn't expect to see much information coming from studies of that sort any time soon. Of course, the biggest deterrent to progress on the systematics of Ichneumonidae is the dearth of persons working on the group. That is partly a consequence of the fact that taxonomic research doesn't generally have a very high priority in the scheme of things.

 
new species
I photographed one this week that closely resembles this but also might be a new species. Is there anyone doing taxonomic research on these Ichies that I could send specimens to if I collect?

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.