Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#488736
Male Parcoblatta - Parcoblatta pennsylvanica - male

Male Parcoblatta - Parcoblatta pennsylvanica - Male
Perry County, Pennsylvania, USA
The identifiers look just like pennsylvanica, but yet the entire coloration is different than all the pennsylvanica males in the colony. Any thoughts?

I actually had to coach my dad through the steps to take a macro photograph with my camera, since both my hands were restraining the roach. So credit for the photo really goes to my dad :)

Images of this individual: tag all
Male Parcoblatta - Parcoblatta pennsylvanica - male Male Parcoblatta - Parcoblatta pennsylvanica - male Male Parcoblatta - Parcoblatta pennsylvanica - male Male Parcoblatta - Parcoblatta pennsylvanica - male

Moved
Moved from Wood Cockroaches. Alright. Even though I am skeptical, I will believe it

I agree
That is part of the challenge in taxonomy- deciding which characters are reliable. The color pattern is generally good but not great in cockroaches. Characters related to mating (e.g. the structures/glands on the median segment) are considered more solid than others because they are related to the definition of what a species is. It is always possible that there are "cryptic species" within this group, and only time will tell if you are right- that the difference is significant. Until then, I think we should go with the median segment characters as the only reliable ones.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.