Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Registration
is open for the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2023
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Hexapods (Hexapoda)
»
Insects (Insecta)
»
Grasshoppers, Crickets, Katydids (Orthoptera)
»
Grasshoppers (Caelifera)
»
Short-horned Grasshoppers (Acrididae)
»
Band-winged Grasshoppers (Oedipodinae)
»
Chortophagini
»
Chortophaga
»
Green-striped Grasshopper (Chortophaga viridifasciata)
»
Southern Green-striped Grasshopper (Chortophaga viridifasciata australior)
Photo#588959
Copyright © 2011
William Donald Newton
Grasshopper ID, please. -
Chortophaga viridifasciata
Chamblee, DeKalb County, Georgia, USA
August 2, 2011
Images of this individual:
tag all
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
William Donald Newton
on 20 October, 2011 - 11:33pm
Last updated 1 July, 2012 - 2:12pm
Moved
Moved from
Southern Green-Striped Grasshopper
.
…
David J. Ferguson
, 1 July, 2012 - 2:12pm
login
or
register
to post comments
There is an interesting paper
here
that outlines most of the differences, though it is biased somewhat. The insects they were looking at in the study were all from Nebraska and Iowa, with no "true" southern
australior
included. However, I do tend to agree with the conclusions reached in this paper.
In short though,
C. australior
is usually more strongly patterned, darker on the sternum, with dark bars across the hind femora (? always present on the lower margin). The dark patterning is least developed in green form individuals, and some individuals may be as "plain" as is usual in "typical"
viridifasciata
. Southern
australior
also have the pronotum usually shorter (less produced with a more obtuse angle to the rear), and the median crest averages lower. It usually appears slightly sockier, but I've never measured parts, it may just be that the wings average shorter, or it could be that the whole insect is a bit more "compact". In typical form, the two seem quite distinct, but problems come when it turns out that not one of the distinguishing characteristics is stable as you move north to south; southward all traits become more like "typical"
australior
, but not equally at the same rate of change, and not equally the same at different seasons.
…
David J. Ferguson
, 25 October, 2011 - 11:39am
login
or
register
to post comments
Wow ...
... some geographic selection on-going, I'm sure. I've printed Brust, Hoback and Wright (2008) - will read it later today. A Chortophaga-ist dedicated to a few years of travel and collection across the allegedly-two species' ranges could resolve the problem or go blind in the effort. Some biological process is ongoing, selection, evolution, speciation ... Chortophaga has some big chromosomes worthy of analysis as I recall from my cell-biology days.
…
William Donald Newton
, 25 October, 2011 - 12:08pm
login
or
register
to post comments
In my collection they are all C. viridifasciata,
but they are separated here on BugGuide, following Daniel Otte and the Orthoptera Specis File (which most authors do at the moment), so I'm going to put your photos here under the
australior
category. In the future this may get adjusted back to subspecies on BugGuide, but not for the moment.
Moved from
ID Request
.
…
David J. Ferguson
, 25 October, 2011 - 10:50am
login
or
register
to post comments
indeed she is Chortophaga
Something of a judgement call as to the best name - I'd go with
C. australior
I think but Chemblee may be inland enough to be in an area where they are intermediate with
C. viridifasciata
. Drawing a line between the two "species" is somewhat arbitrary.
…
David J. Ferguson
, 22 October, 2011 - 10:33pm
login
or
register
to post comments
C. australior reported from Marietta, GA ...
... just NW of Chamblee:
http://bugguide.net/node/view/69316
I'll go with
C. viridifasciata
or whichever has priority.
Thanks.
…
William Donald Newton
, 23 October, 2011 - 6:33am
login
or
register
to post comments
When combined as one species (which has been done)
C. viridifasciata
is the name of priority, and
australior
becomes the subspecies or synonym of the other. Currently the trend is to call them different species, but biologically they certainly are not (at least not the way I see it - two distinct species should not be blending into one another where they meet). They are not exactly the same though, and most authors at least give
australior
subspecies status. Yours "looks" more like
australior
to me, but I'd need to see more from the same population to be sure if she is "good" pure
australior
or if you are in the blend zone in that area.
…
David J. Ferguson
, 25 October, 2011 - 10:46am
login
or
register
to post comments
What nuance of anatomy ...
... separates the allegedly two species? This is some good biology! I'll keep looking for them, for sure!
…
William Donald Newton
, 25 October, 2011 - 11:23am
login
or
register
to post comments
Chortophaga ...
... perhaps?
…
William Donald Newton
, 20 October, 2011 - 11:50pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.