Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Photos of insects and people from the 2014 gathering in Virginia, June 4-7.

Photos of insects and people from the 2013 gathering in Arizona, July 25-28

Photos of insects and people from the 2012 gathering in Alabama

Photos of insects and people from the 2011 gathering in Iowa

Photos from the 2010 Workshop in Grinnell, Iowa

Photos from the 2009 gathering in Washington

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#85663
small wasp - female

small wasp - Female
Topsham, Orange County, Vermont, USA
October 31, 2006
Size: 3.2mm

Moved
Moved from Eucoilidae.

Fantastic
A superb female of the family Eucoilidae of superfamily Cynipoidea. Contrary to related Gall Wasps, these insects parasitize maggots and pupae of small flies, especially Acalyptrate Schizophora. Moniliform antennae and the small "crater" in the middle of the scutellum are the hallmarks for this special family.

 
Eucoilidae
I didn't notice the "crater", but it does look realy distinctive. Thanks Richard for identifying a new family for bugguide!

 
Thank YOU, Tom.
If it is possible, Tom, your images have gotten even BETTER than when I first discovered your work over at Pbase. Just outstanding:-)

 
That's very nice Eric
A combination of upgrading equiptment earlier this year, and learning from experience, and talking with other photographers, can make a difference.
On a technical note, I've cut back my f-stop to 11, because I was told that higher than that the image starts to degrade, and I've noticed better results since then.

 
We read your comment about f-stop with interest!
We're going to try that ourselves at the very next opportunity, but we're wondering if there was an explanation given as to why this is the case. At least with slide film, it always seemed that the smaller aperture/higher f-stop/greater depth of field gave a better image. Any thoughts?

 
This is what I've been told
A higher f-stop does give better depth of field, but it looses some of the fine detail that you want in macro photos. The explanation I got was that when the aperature is too small, the light actually has to bend to cover the sensor.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.