Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#91717
wingless whatzit - female

wingless whatzit - Female
Windham, Rockingham County, New Hampshire, USA
Size: about 2.9 mm
Collected by sifting hand-shredded moss samples. I looks like a gn*at that never had wings. Unlike many apterous insects it's completely smooth and unmarked in the area where wings would normally attach. I don't know what to make of it. I wish I were able to wring more detail out of my images, which are already boosted in lightness, contrast and sharpening. I can't even tell if it has eyes.

Images of this individual: tag all
wingless whatzit - female wingless whatzit - female wingless whatzit - female wingless whatzit - female wingless whatzit - female

Moved

Moved

Moved
Moved from Gall Midges.

Not sure cecidomyiid....
I think it is a wingless, female sciarid, maybe Pnyxia (which don't have an eye bridge like most sciarids). Also paedogenesis is actual larvae producing offspring (clones; somes cecids and sciarids, along with micromalthid beetles do this). The term for adults that retain larval characters, but are reproductively viable, is neoteny.

Cecidomyiidae
Looks like a wingless gall midge to me - the eyes are visible if you look closely.

 
Thanks, Don. It did have that dipteran look.
I see we've already got a bunch in this family but they all have wings.

 
Paedogenesis?
It must be one of those species that reproduces by paedogenesis (reproduction by larvae). There several genera of Cecidomyiidae that do this.

 
Are you suggesting this one is a larva?
I see several adult features, not the least of which are legs and antennae.

 
No.
In paedogenesis, adults keep certain larval features and are able to reproduce. I guess that I didn't express myself correctly, but I was quoting Borror literally. Now I am going to have to figure this out.
Aphids do this sort of things for a number of generations, then produce a generation of winged adults that look different.

 
Paedogenesis vs paedomorphy
I think you're confusing terms. In paedogenesis, "immatures" can reproduce (e.g. micromalthids and some cecidomyiids). Paedomorphosis means the adults retain characteristics of the juveniles. This individual isn't paedogenic... just a wingless adult. If you consider aptery to be a characteristic of larvae, then maybe you could call it paedomorphic... but I'm not sure if that's conventional.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.