Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Discussion, insects and people from the 2018 BugGuide Gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Photos of insects and people from the 2014 gathering in Virginia, June 4-7.

Photos of insects and people from the 2013 gathering in Arizona, July 25-28

Photos of insects and people from the 2012 gathering in Alabama

Photos of insects and people from the 2011 gathering in Iowa

Photos from the 2010 Workshop in Grinnell, Iowa

Photos from the 2009 gathering in Washington

TaxonomyBrowse
Info
ImagesLinksBooksData

Species Harpalus texanus

Harpalus texanus - female Harpalus texanus - female Harpalus texanus - female Harpalus texanus - male Harpalus texanus - male Harpalus texanus - male Harpalus texanus - male Harpalus texanus - male
Classification
Kingdom Animalia (Animals)
Phylum Arthropoda (Arthropods)
Subphylum Hexapoda (Hexapods)
Class Insecta (Insects)
Order Coleoptera (Beetles)
Suborder Adephaga (Ground and Water Beetles)
Family Carabidae (Ground Beetles)
Subfamily Harpalinae
Supertribe Harpalitae
Tribe Harpalini
Subtribe Harpalina
Genus Harpalus
No Taxon (Subgenus Pseudoophonus)
No Taxon (pensylvanicus group)
Species texanus (Harpalus texanus)
Explanation of Names
Harpalus texanus Casey 1914
Identification
externally very similar to H. pensylvanicus, reliable distinction is possible only by careful examination inside the aedeagus. Ball & Anderson (1962) described the diagnostic microscopic structures of the everted internal sac. The females are reliably identified by their association with captured males.

Bypassing the demanding procedure for everting the internal sac, I (PWM) examined instead the more accessible apex of the aedeagus which in texanus appears to be naturally exposed in many specimens. Morphology of the apex in combination with the other features noted below should provide a reasonably diagnostic approach for H. texanus vs H. pensylvanicus.

(1) Aedeagus with apical shaft wider; extreme tip rounder, bordered ventrally by a thin smooth elevated lip against proximal rough area vs apical shaft narrower; extreme tip more pointed, without defined lip;
(2) Pronotum with basal groove more or less interrupted by punctures laterally, but not consistently so and never extensively interrupted vs basal groove extensively interrupted;
(3) Both sexes with shinier elytra (best appreciated under microscopy) vs duller luster;
(4) Pronotum slightly more constricted toward base vs base wider;
(5) Pronotal base with areas around depressions more convex and less uniformly punctate vs flat portion across base larger, extending anterolaterally to sides more widely flattened, punctate coarsely and uniformly;
(6) Body slightly broader vs narrower;
(7) Restricted to Coastal Plain from NC to TX vs likely occurs sympatrically near the same coastal areas plus the eastern half of North America.
Range
Coastal Plain, NC-FL-eTX