Elachistidae: Antaeotricha schlaegeri - Antaeotricha schlaegeri - BugGuide.Net

HomeGuideID RequestRecentFrassForumsDonateHelp

Clickable Guide

Calendar

Upcoming Events

Registration is open for the 2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho July 24-27

Moth submissions from National Moth Week 2023

Photos of insects and people from the 2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico, July 20-24

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Photos of insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Previous events

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData

Home » Guide » Arthropods (Arthropoda) » Hexapods (Hexapoda) » Insects (Insecta) » Butterflies and Moths (Lepidoptera) » Twirler Moths and kin (Gelechioidea) » Depressariidae » Stenomatinae » Antaeotricha » Schlaeger's Fruitworm Moth - Hodges#1011 (Antaeotricha schlaegeri)

Photo#1079423

Copyright © 2015 Carl Barrentine

Elachistidae: Antaeotricha schlaegeri - Antaeotricha schlaegeri

Erskine, Polk County, Minnesota, USA
June 6, 2015
Size: Length ~ 1.5 cm

Images of this individual: tag all

Elachistidae: Antaeotricha schlaegeri - Antaeotricha schlaegeri

Elachistidae: Antaeotricha schlaegeri - Antaeotricha schlaegeri

tag · login or register to post comments

Contributed by Carl Barrentine on 6 June, 2015 - 4:00pm

Observations

Any chance the size is wrong? If not, I wonder if size can be used. This looks like leucillana to me. There is a spot in the basal quarter at the bend of the costal margin. This spot is never this well defined in BOLD images of A. schlaegeri and when present, tends to not reach the costa and tends to be closer the the next spot further out. They usually touch or are connected not so offset and well separated like yours. Compare Mark's images of both species here, here, and here. This is just an observation and may amount to nothing.

… Steve Nanz, 9 June, 2016 - 7:29am

login or register to post comments

Thanks, Steve!

My estimated measurement (length ~ 1.5 cm) may be off +/- a mm either way, so I would use this metric for species determination, especially given the size variation in moths I've observed over the last five seasons. My sense is that this specimen may be a better match for A. leucillana. If you agree, then please move the images. I've spied only two examples of this genus in 5 years, and so have no experience wrestling with the intricacies required to separate A. leucillana from A. schlaegeri. I certainly trust your good judgment. I will take an exact measurement of the next specimens I find.

… Carl Barrentine, 15 June, 2016 - 5:04pm

login or register to post comments

--

1 mm wouldn't matter. Based on the literature, I guess we should leave it for now. We'll eventually sort this out if it's wrong. Thanks for getting back.

… Steve Nanz, 15 June, 2016 - 6:00pm

login or register to post comments

Disclaimer: Dedicated naturalists volunteer their time and resources here to provide this service. We strive to provide accurate information, but we are mostly just amateurs attempting to make sense of a diverse natural world. If you need expert professional advice, contact your local extension office.

Contributors own the copyright to and are solely responsible for contributed content.
Click the contributor's name for licensing and usage information.
Everything else copyright © 2003-2024 Iowa State University, unless otherwise noted.

Bugguide is hosted by:

Printer Friendly Version

Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
Site Map
Contact