Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#124913
Nomada - female

Nomada - Female
Eaton Canyon Natural Area, alt. 960 ft., Los Angeles County, California, USA
April 30, 2007
Size: 7 mm
Taking nectar in a Cryptantha .
Looks similar to some of the red Nomada , but I wonder whether its possible to tell more?
ruficornis species group, acc. to John Ascher (see comments below).

Images of this individual: tag all
Nomada - female Nomada

Moved
Moved from Nomada.

Moved

NOT Nomada ruficornis
"species group" does not mean species

 
Appreciate your help
and comments, John. Earlier I had noticed (see comments below) that under the ruficornis species group Michener lists Gnathias , Heminomada , Lamproapis , and others. I don't know enough how to proceed here. Do you suggest to post these under Nomada ?

 
Gnathias , Heminomada...
These are former subgenera.

There are three issues here:

1. These former subgenera are now lumped with subgenus Nomada (sensu stricto) in a single taxon (now a species group as formal subgenera are no longer recognized in Nomada).

2. This taxon was recognized by Alexander (and later Michener and others) as a formal species group (assemblage of related species) corresponding to MULTIPLE former subgenera (e.g., subgenera sensu Mitchell, 1962) including Gnathias , Heminomada, Nomada, Phor and others.

3. Whereas other species groups of Alexander are well defined and monophyletic, the ruficornis species group is relatively poorly defined and may prove to be non-monophyletic. However, much of the troublesome diversity is in the Old World so not a problem for Bugguide. The problem of delimiting an appropriate ruficornis group=Nomada sensu stricto taxon is one reason why Alexander did not propose a subgeneric system for this genus.

 
Thanks, John,
for these additional explanations!

the lateral yellow tergal spots are distinctive
so this Nomada female may be identifiable someday

for now I can at least place it in the ruficornis species group.

California Nomada are diverse and a real challenge. There are no keys for most of them.

 
Thanks, John,
for your informative comments, especially since writing from Turkey (but isn't the internet great).
I looked up the ruficornis group in Michener (2000, (1)), who lists Nomada s.s., Gnathias , Heminomada , and a number of others.

 
note that the species Nomada ruficornis
is not found in North America

Thus the "Nomada ruficornis" guide page was inappropriate

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.