Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Upcoming Events

Giving Tuesday, November 30. Please consider a gift to BugGuide!

BugGuide is a National Moth Week Partner. How to add your National Moth Week 2021 photos. July 17-25.

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

National Moth Week 2020 photos of insects and people.

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 BugGuide Gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Discussion, insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Photos of insects and people from the 2014 gathering in Virginia, June 4-7.

Photos of insects and people from the 2013 gathering in Arizona, July 25-28

Previous events

Striped micromoth - Eucosma fulvotegulana

Striped micromoth - Eucosma fulvotegulana
Loveland, Larimer County, Colorado, USA
April 18, 2017
I first thought of the moths around 5300-5400 (Crambid), but they seem to have the long fuzzy snouts. Another group that came to mind were Phaneta (Eucosma?) sp. 2960-70 (Tort.).

Moved from ID Request.

Wow, thank you!
Great work Bob! I've been relying on MPG, scrolling chronologically by Hodges number, but they have no entry for this.

Your help is appreciated. Thank you sir.

Wow, Bob. I must have looked right over that one!! Thanks

Your dilemma interested me so I tried to think along with you. Is it not just the palps that gave me trouble with the Crambus, but the strong double white stripe. Of the Tortricids, I thought these might be the closest. , , or .

Thanks for your help!
It does help to have two or more heads thinking together. Of those three, the middle might have a "fighting chance" of being a match, especially if factoring in some variability. The bottom line though doesn't seem to stretch across fully "to connect the dots" as needed. I wonder why MPG lists that (2973) as Phaneta striatana, while BG lists it as Eucosma striatana. Is one not current?

Maybe the palps difference is due to lighting, and my picture is more in the shadows. Just a thought.

I'm going to keep looking. I noticed that a lot of images in key areas on MPG were missing images. I might investigate BOLD images too.

I've seen a number of odd moths in this area, and feel that a few could be new species.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.