Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

longhorn collection

When you pin your longhorns, do you put the antennas back on the body or in front of the head in their natural position?
Are they both ok to do? Which one do you prefer?

Thank you

Louis-Philippe

Thank you
Thanks for all these informations! I haven't decided yet if I prefer to put the antennaes backward for its safety or in a natural position for the trophy.

personal or practical
My personal preference is to make all the beetles look natural and impressive. I have mounted some of those phenomenal Cerambycids with antennae many times the body length with them outstretched to awe the observer. Practically speaking though, most collectors arrange the antennae along the body, sometimes completely surrounding the beetle multiple times, and the legs folded in to minimize the space occupied by the specimen. Not so great to look at, but it takes longer before you need to buy another storage cabinet.

 
minimize the footprint, protect the specimen
my own primary consideration is to give the specimen the best chance to survive shipping via mail without bracing and such
this is also why i prefer card-mounting to point-mounting in many cases

 
Often comes down to wish for "trophy/esthetic" vs "scientific"
collection. Latter decision requires that all appendages be tucked in to prevent damage during the frequent handling needed for study.

 
sure- take care with handling
The science is often expedited by mounting that allows good observation of all appendages and full visibility of the specimen underside. Scientific study may involve careful handling of a specimen with its appendages exposed. Lots of the specimens at the museums where I work have damage especially after genitalia examination, and all the pieces are retained.

 
sure - appendages tucked not too tightly
beneath specimen still allows 98% chance of seeing ventral diagnostic parts in my experience. The taxonomist does not need to see the entire venter unobstructed. A rare part that needs to be slightly moved in a hurry is accomplished with brush tip soaked in a relaxing fluid (full strength ammonia cheapest). Antennae are at greatest risk so I always try to have them alongside thorax when mounting fresh specimens.

 
Spreading for images
Your approach is fine for an expert such as yourself who will be performing the ID personally, and then sticking the bug away in a repository. As a non-expert, my habit is to post images of a specimen on BG which show as many key features as possible (which I may not know about beforehand) with a minimal number of images. The goal is to eventually show all features needed to key it, with follow-up images if necessary. Placing the antennae alongside the body for protection and compactness is fine for cerambycids. However, spreading the legs wide offers the best chance for leg and ventral features to be seen, such as here:

As an added benefit afterwards, this serves an educational function in that other non-experts may see for themselves what the key is describing in words.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.