Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Upcoming Events

BugGuide is a National Moth Week Partner. How to add your National Moth Week 2021 photos. July 17-25.

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

National Moth Week 2020 photos of insects and people.

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 BugGuide Gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Discussion, insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Photos of insects and people from the 2014 gathering in Virginia, June 4-7.

Photos of insects and people from the 2013 gathering in Arizona, July 25-28

Previous events

Weevil - Anthonomus elongatus

Weevil - Anthonomus elongatus
Montréal, Quebec, Canada
August 26, 2007
Size: 2.5 mm without the nose
On goldenrod. Maybe Hypera rumicis ??


Anthonomus elongatus
I just saw this species today in the collection while looking for a name for a species collected by Tom Murray, and thought "have I seen this on bugguide recently?" Boris was right as to the genus, and it is a much more elongate form than for the other species.

...much more elongate than the other species?
elongatus is nice, but fulvus ain't no slouch...

In a bout of dyslexia, I read "much more elongate" than other spp. as "much more elegant" (!) which I took umbrage at. My apology.

Thanks for the identification.

Not Hypera
But in subfamily Curculioninae, note the long, curved rostrum. It reminds in general form, and because of the pattern, of the genus Antho*nomus.
Only very few species of that genus are, on the other hand, as slender as this one appears. I suggest to place it, after some time, in subfamily level.

Probably not Hypera rumicis
Just from the specific epithet one would expect it to be a specialist in Rumex, a completely unrelated genus. After looking around a bit on the internet, I'm pretty sure it is. Maybe another species of Hypera?

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.