A few days ago I noticed that the epithets of five
Timema species had their spelling changed since I'd last perused the
Timema pages of
Wikipedia and the
Phasmida Species File web site. Specifically, the spelling of the epithets as given in their original descriptions (on left below), were modified as shown:
landelsensis →
landelsense
monikensis →
monikense
morongensis →
morongense
poppensis →
poppense
ritensis →
ritense
Near the bottom of the Phasmida Species Files
Timema page was the following note:
"Scrutiny: Yanega, 2018, Timema is expressly neuter in gender, some changings to endings of species — hence -ensis automatically becomes -ense"
Not being especially well-versed in Greek and Latin grammar, nor the associated nomenclatural rules & technicalities, I sought to learn more by consulting various references (in books and online). Here's a summary of my current understanding...
please comment/correct if you find I'm in error!:
1) The Latin suffixes -ensis and -ense are genitive case endings denoting "of..." or "from...". For example, the epithet ritensis indicates "from the Santa Rita Mountains" of Arizona. The standardized Latin gender endings here are: -is = masculine & feminine; and -e = neuter.
2) In a paper on the taxonomy of Phasmatodea, Bradley & Galil (1977) state (at the top of pg. 196 here):
"The name 'To timema-atos' is neuter, and the stem on which the family name must he formed is Timemat-."
I could not find a translation of what "To timema-atos" actually means...though I'd very much like to know! Nor am I clear on the context/implications of the ending "-atos" appended to "timema" in the quote above. But I suppose this to be in accord with Doug Yanega's assertion of neuter gender for the genus name (e.g. as inherited from the family name?).
3) Thus, per the International Code of Zoolological Nomenclature (cf. Article 31.2 and Article 19.2) it appears the spellings using -ense above are indeed the appropriate emendations for use on BugGuide and elsewhere.
Since such a spelling change may cause confusion (and perhaps controversy?)...I wanted to post this forum article to provide a resource for sharing info and discussing the issue. Any confusion relating to the original vs. emended spellings — e.g. caused by different usages in earlier uneditable BugGuide comments, published papers, or elsewhere — can refer here for clarification.
Again, please comment & correct under this forum article if you see fit...else I'll assume it appropriate (in the coming days) to change the name endings on the BugGuide nodes corresponding to the epithets listed above. Thanks!