The specimen is at work though. I will fill in the collection details tomorrow.

Thank you so much for the ID. For some reason I kept coming to Notiobia (Anisotarsus) in the key I was using (Lindroth, 1961). I’m sure I was just misinterpreting a feature.

I should probably get my hands on a newer reference for Carabidae. Bousquet (2010) looks like a great reference for my area. Anything else you can recommend?

Hind tarsus with first tarsomere distinctly longer than longest apical spur of metatibia. Male front tarsi underneath with spongy adhesive setae. --> on the way to Notiobia.

Hind tarsus with first tarsomere not or slightly longer than longest apical spur of metatibia. Male front tarsi underneath with seriate adhesive setae. --> on the way to Harpalus.

Imaged here is a female so genus separation is not so obvious.
In this case, the absence of any setigerous punctures in the vicinity of elytral interval #3 lends support to subgenus Harpalus (Pseudoophonus) and eliminates genus Notiobia.

Looks pretty hard to come by. Used copies on Amazon are pretty pricey. Any other ideas where to get a copy?

(1) Amazon.com: best price for new copy $198, beats used copies.

(2) Bookfinder.com: best price for new copy $155 (includes shipping) via AbeBooks, beats used copies.

(3) Personally photocopy the book held in a university/entomology library or, if possible, borrow it via your interlibrary loan system. I know of one grad student who used a university photocopier machine to convert blocks of pages by taxonomic sections into PDF files. If you're only interested in adults, the large larvae section can be skipped. Photographs (B&W and color plates) were captured well by the PDF files. I believe the entire copying process was free as long as everything was saved to a personal USB storage devise inserted into the machine.