Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#158022
Chalcedon Checkerspot - Euphydryas anicia--c - male

Chalcedon Checkerspot - Euphydryas anicia--c - Male
Black Hills NF, Pennington County, South Dakota, USA
June 3, 2005

Moved
Best to look at the "Info" sections for each group of subspecies for more explanation of why this one is here now. This is a confusing group that can be subdivided in several ways, depending upon which author you follow. To be consistent, it is grouped with other subspecies that have "anicia" type genitalia, but that look like E. chalcedona. I think they should be part of E. chalcedona, or at least not anicia. Regardless, this is still considered as ssp. bernadetta though. I hope moving it again isn't too confusing.

Moved from Chalcedon Checkerspot.

This is E. chalcedona
It is probably referable to subspecies bernadetta, which was described originally from Sioux County, Nebraska, not far from the Black Hills.

Moved from Anicia Checkerspot.

 
Thanks!
I only called it anicia because I thought chalcedon was a more western bug. What's the total range of each species?

 
For the most part you are correct
E. chalcedona is mostly found west from the Continental Divide; however, it extends east into the Black hills / Niobrara region where the subspecies bernadetta was described from. So, generally E. anicia ranges a bit further east, is a bit less prevalent near the west coast and seems to range a bit further north into Canada, and a bit further south in Arizona. For the most part though, they are both widespread through mountainous regions west from the Rockies. It is not unusual to find the two together in the same area (as in the Black Hills). Almost (if not quite) universally, E. chalcedona is blacker looking, with much less orange above; almost black and white (or yellow). Below there is little difference. E. chalcedona tends to average larger in any given region, but it's not consistent enough, and overlap is too great to rely on size. The books have mixed them together so much lately that the definition of the two has been badly blurred, and some people still consider that each region has a different species, so it's confusing.

 
Thanks!
Awesome, thanks so much for the info! I really appreciate it.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.