Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Registration
is open for the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2023
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Hexapods (Hexapoda)
»
Insects (Insecta)
»
True Bugs, Cicadas, Hoppers, Aphids and Allies (Hemiptera)
»
Plant-parasitic Hemipterans (Sternorrhyncha)
»
Psylloidea
»
Psyllidae
»
Psyllinae
»
Euglyptoneura
»
Euglyptoneura robusta
Photo#161514
Copyright © 2007
Joyce Gross
psyllid -
Euglyptoneura robusta
UC Big Creek Reserve, Monterey County, California, USA
June 3, 2006
Size: ~2mm
This is a psyllid, right? Most of the psyllids I've seen have more transparent wings. This was on ceanothus.
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
Joyce Gross
on 19 December, 2007 - 1:54am
Last updated 4 June, 2015 - 11:14pm
Moved
Moved from
Madrone Psyllid
.
…
Chris Mallory
, 4 June, 2015 - 11:14pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Euglyptoneura robusta
This one has been bothering me for a while now. My first question: what would a Madrone-specialist that has never been recorded on another host be doing on Ceanothus? If an isolated instance, I wouldn't give it a second thought; adult psyllids are found all the time on plants other than their hosts. What gave me pause was Alice Abela's psyllid (which I maintain is the same as yours) also on Ceanothus, as well as your nymph on Ceanothus, nymphs being much more host-restricted than adults:
I consulted the relevant literature (Schwarz 1904, Crawford 1914, Ferris & Hyatt 1923, Tuthill 1943) and I've come to the conclusion that this is most definitely not
Neophyllura arbuti
. Despite the obvious color differences (the species is described as reddish-brown to yellowish-brown with light brown wings, and dark maculae ahead of the clavus), there are marked differences in wing venation and head structure. Perhaps the most pronounced difference is in the venation:
Note the
heavily
sinuate veins, especially Rs and the branches of M, the small size of the cubital cell, and the complete absence of a pterostigma, none of which agree with your psyllid. Additionally, the head structures don't match Schwarz's description either, notably the shape of the genal cones, the insertion of the antennae, and the antenna length, which are described as being smaller than the width of the head. I did a quick overlay of Schwarz's head diagram with Alice's photo to demonstrate the inconsistencies of head shape in a way which may be more easy to understand than a text description:
here
.
Hopefully these factors prove how this psyllid cannot be the same as the one in your photo (if you're interested, I've uploaded 3 descriptions and 2 images of
N. arbuti
here
if you wish to compare them as well; this comment would be too long if I went over
everything
). But if not
N. arbuti
, what is it? More psyllid species occur on Ceanothus in California than any other plant. However, after reviewing the literature for all relevant species and running through the relevant keys, I've come to the conclusion that it is
Euglyptoneura robusta
, and there isn't really anything similar to it.
E. robusta
's description fits your psyllid perfectly: general color variable,but head and thorax usually light brown, and white forewings with 2 large dark irregular maculae. The overall white color is caused by a fine white pulverulence covering more or less the entire insect. The structure of the head is also consistent (another overlay with Crawford's illustration superimposed on Alice's image is
here
- note the position of the antennae insertion, the shape of the genal cones and vertex (the direction the antennae are pointing - more forward in Alice's image - is obviously not important). The wing venation is also much more consistent:
Note the large cubital, the short non-sinuate M and Rs veins, and the small pterostigma. Note that Crawford's original illustration was very faded such that the maculae were very faint, I adjusted the contrast in photoshop to better show these, but as a result they became somewhat blurred. Blurriness aside, note the position of these maculae relative to your psyllid. Also note the antennae length, over 1.5x the head width. All other visible characters and structures also agree with the species' description, which I've uploaded
here
if you're interested.
After doing all of this research, I was surprised to find that
E. robusta
already exists in the guide in the form of this pinned specimen:
Note that the extent of the brown maculae is variable in this species according to both Tuthill and Crawford, but despite their reduced appearance in that individual they are still positioned in the same manner as your images when they are preasent. Structurally, your psyllid is also consistent with that pinned specimen (though they are so much prettier in life than while dead, I must say).
I propose both your psyllid and Alice's psyllid be moved to
E. robusta
. I also propose that your nymph be moved to 'Psyllidae' - I can't say with certainty if it corresponds to this species, or to this other psyllid you found on the same Ceanothus:
or if it's one of California's other 10+ Ceanothus psyllids. Unfortunately, the life history is not known for many of them.
…
Chris Mallory
, 3 June, 2015 - 7:35pm
login
or
register
to post comments
thanks!
Wow, that's a lot of detailed information. This one always bothered me too -- it didn't make sense that a psyllid on Ceanothus would be a Madrone-specialist. Thanks so much for delving into the literature and recording the details here, and moving my images (of the nymph too).
…
Joyce Gross
, 18 June, 2015 - 9:51pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Neophyllura arbuti (Crawford) --det. R. Gill
his comment: "This is a native species formerly in the genus
Euphyllurus
. This color form is rather unusual but this is probably the right species name. It feeds on
Arbutus menziesii
(Madrone)"
Moved from
Euphyllurinae
.
…
v belov
, 28 August, 2013 - 6:26pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Moved
Moved from
Psyllidae
.
…
v belov
, 15 June, 2013 - 10:32am
login
or
register
to post comments
Yes Psyllidae, they look to b
Yes Psyllidae, they look to be in the genus Euphyllura or near by. I'm not sure on species. We get several of these pretty little guys here in the Sierran foothills.
…
Dennis Haines
, 19 December, 2007 - 10:06am
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.