Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#1634528
Poecilus texanus (LeConte 1863) - Poecilus cyanicolor - female

Poecilus texanus (LeConte 1863) - Poecilus cyanicolor - Female
I-17, Sunset Point rest stop, 3,400' elevation , Yavapai County, Arizona, USA
July 19, 2018
Size: ~14.0 mm
I found this interesting Poecilus in central Arizona at night immediately following a 2-3 hour violent rainstorm. It has a black surface with violet reflections and metallic green borders.
This individual keys out to chalcites in Lindroth's monograph by shape of the pronotum. I believe this could be a different species for the following reasons:
1. Habitat. P. chalcites is a primarily eastern species. This specimen was collected on a high elevation cliff top with many cactuses, desert broom, and other typical Arizonan scrub vegetation on otherwise barren soil.
2. Distribution. Bousquet remarks chalcites' occurrence in Arizona is doubtful. Furthermore, most primarily eastern species that reach Arizona only make it to the southeast corner of the state.
3. Color and morphology. This specimen is about 14.0 mm, nearly 1.5 mm larger than my largest example of chalcites. The color is different than any chalcites I've seen. Most convincingly, the sides of the entire thorax are smooth in this specimen, while they are coarsely punctured in all nine examples I have of chalcites from Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky and Nebraska. The abbreviated scutular striae are also shorter than in my specimens of chalcites.

Lindroth does not include Arizonan species mexicanus or texanus in his work. While within Arizona, Bousquet only recognizes those species to occur in southeastern Arizona.
I only collected this one individual and have not spent a great deal of time with it under the scope. I can't remember if I have ever been able to find the species descriptions of mexicanus or texanus either. Help much wanted.

Images of this individual: tag all
Poecilus texanus (LeConte 1863) - Poecilus cyanicolor - female Poecilus sp. - Poecilus cyanicolor - female Poecilus sp. - Poecilus cyanicolor - female

Moved
Moved from Poecilus texanus.

After re-keying and comparing to the type image of P. cyaneus on the MCZ database, which has a deceptively punctured hind pronotal angle by virtue of debris(grease?). I believe this is a new state record for what is now called P. cyanicolor, which is darker and with a proportionately larger pronotum when comparing type images with P. texanus.

 
Poecilus cyanicolor AZ rec. n.
This new state record for Arizona is added to the Registry of Nearctic Geadephaga. Thank you Jonathan for alerting us.

For the record, why again is this morphologically not Poecilus chalcites which has uncertain status in Arizona?

 
LeConte separates P. cyanicol
LeConte separates P. cyanicolor from P. chalcites and texanus by the absence of punctures around the basal fovea, and also by the pronotum being more narrowed behind when compared to P. chalcites and texanus which usually have a broader basal margin compared to the anterior margin. I have also noticed that my P. cyanicolor does not have distinctly punctured stria while chalcites does. My individual of P. cyanicolor is also much larger than any of my nine P. chalcites examples. It is also much darker than the P. chalcites; cyaneus meaning dark/sea blue.

 
Thank you.
Those distinctions are helpful.

Moved
Moved from Poecilus.

Your initial image set leans toward Poecilus texanus but ...
I need more clarity in both photography and discussion. Lindroth couplet #34/1 would go to both P. chalcites (Say) and P. texanus (LeConte) = mczbase.mcz.harvard.edu/guid/MCZ:Ent:5638. Comparing to P. chalcites, LeConte's holotype image of P. texanus shows the pronotum proportionately broader, elytral stria relatively impunctate (chalcites with prominent punctures), and the basal antennomeres dark (rufous in chalcites). Supposedly the dorsal luster of both species is "metallic", perhaps less so in texanus. Jonathan, does any of this help you decide? I can't tell for sure from photos the coloration of basal antennomeres, but there is the suggestion they are dark. The striae do appear without prominent punctures.

 
All of those characters you'v
All of those characters you've mentioned do match my specimen. The metallic coloration of this specimen obviously isn't as vibrant as in chalcites, but it is still there. I feel confident your suggestion of P. texanus is correct. I'll create and move it to the species page. Thank you

 
I'll follow your lead for Poecilus texanus.
Very nice!

 
Can you give me the link to the holotype image?
Curiosity got the best of me; I tracked down two LeConte papers that review P. texanus through google scholar. They certainly describe this specimen. In his original description he states: "Obscure cupreo-aeneus". I will attribute this to the fact that the cupreous/aeneous reflections are more apparent along the side margins of the specimen, while having a less vibrant center.

I wasn't able to find the holotype image. I would be very interested in seeing it.

Edit: Err, just found the link in your original comment. My bad!

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.