Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Photos of insects and people from the 2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico, July 20-24

National Moth Week was July 23-31, 2022! See moth submissions.

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Photos of insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12


Previous events


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#1646668
Cerobasis? - Pteroxanium kelloggi

Cerobasis? - Pteroxanium kelloggi
Presidio, Battery Godfrey, San Francisco County, California, USA
March 30, 2019
Size: ca 3 mm
Beat from fallen pine cone. I think this might be that undescribed species of Cerobasis mentioned by Dr. Mockford in the past, rather than guestfalica? I collected this one and can send as necessary.

Images of this individual: tag all
Cerobasis? - Pteroxanium kelloggi Cerobasis? - Pteroxanium kelloggi Cerobasis? - Pteroxanium kelloggi Cerobasis? - Pteroxanium kelloggi Cerobasis? - Pteroxanium kelloggi

Moved

Mockford says
" This is a nearly mature nymph of Pteroxanium kelloggi (Ribaga), family Lepidopsocidae. In North America, the species seems to be restricted to the Pacific coast from the San Francisco area north to the Olympic Peninsula, but collecting on the coast north of there (in BC) has been sparse, so we don't know how far north it goes."

You have added a new species and a new genus!

 
Thanks -
so much, Diane and Ed! Actually, it looks like we already have several images of this species - but... it looks like the genus was inappropriately (?) placed under subfamily Lepidopsocinae? According to my Mockford 1993, it looks like it should instead be in Echinopsocinae? If you agree, I can move the taxon back under the family page...

 
Yes...
that would be good.

You find the coolest stuff!
I'm sending this to Mockford for his comments.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.