Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#168943
Which Longhorned Beetle - Orwellion gibbulum

Which Longhorned Beetle - Orwellion gibbulum
Skull Valley, (WSW of Prescott 10 miles), Yavapai County, Arizona, USA
July 15, 2007
Longhorned Beetle, larger
dark brown
attracted to light on house.

Images of this individual: tag all
Which Longhorned Beetle - Orwellion gibbulum Which Longhorned Beetle - Orwellion gibbulum Which Longhorned Beetle - Orwellion gibbulum

Moved
Moved from Elaphidiini.

Not the same genus...
... due to the elongate body.
It reminds more of Anelaphus niveivestitus (Schaeffer, 1905), especially for the orange spots on the pronotum.
Take a look to: http://plant.cdfa.ca.gov/byciddb/details.asp?id=2033

 
Doubtful...
...Anelaphus niveivestitus is a south Texas species and not known from Arizona. It is also a relatively smaller species and with the pronotum less rounded.

I'm less inclined to say Enaphalodes now, which are rather robust. Perhaps Orwellion gibbulum arizonense.

 
Yes, more possible Orwellion...
I agree about distribution, but body length of that specimen is actually unknown.

They're really two very similar species and the length of elytral spines doesn't look so much different.... difficult also to see in that pictures....

 
Antennomere 3 is a clue...
...in Anelaphus it is usually ~1/2 the length of the pronotum, while in Orwellion it is ~2/3 the length. Looks to me like the latter in these photos.

The description above does indicate "larger" - which is why I originally thought of Enaphalodes. Orwellion can also be considered "larger" (though not as large as Enaphalodes), but few Anelaphus would be considered as such.

I have large series of both species in my collection - they are quite different.

Still, a better photo is needed for positive ID, although it is definitely in the tribe Elaphidiini.

p.s. did you receive my email reprint request?

 
reprints
Yes, did you receive my reply?

 
Thanks Francisco & Ted
I couldn't get there without your help! Do appreciate it!

Maybe...
...genus Enaphalodes - a more specific ID is difficult from this photo.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.