Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2024
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Hexapods (Hexapoda)
»
Insects (Insecta)
»
Butterflies and Moths (Lepidoptera)
»
Twirler Moths and kin (Gelechioidea)
»
Twirler Moths (Gelechiidae)
»
Anomologinae
»
Isophrictis
»
Isophrictis rudbeckiella - Hodges#1700 (Isophrictis rudbeckiella)
Photo#1780500
Copyright © 2020 Tony Thomas
moth -
Isophrictis rudbeckiella
-
Groton, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, USA
July 1, 2016
moth genitalia
Identification was made by Steve Nanz (incorrect ID by Tony Thomas)
Images of this individual:
tag all
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
tom murray
on 18 February, 2020 - 3:32pm
Last updated 30 August, 2023 - 1:46pm
Moved
Moved from
Isophrictis similiella
.
…
A.W. Thomas
, 27 May, 2020 - 6:38am
login
or
register
to post comments
Info?
I tried to compare this with the illustrations of
similiella
in Bottimer (1926) and
rudbeckiella
, erroneously named
similiella
, in Heinrich, (1921). Bottimer says "Both species have the harpe of the male genitalia divided, but in the new species it is nearly twice as long as in
similiella
." I don't know enough about genitalia to tell what this. I added the references to both species pages. Could you please reconfirm the ID for MPG?
…
Steve Nanz
, 25 April, 2020 - 8:35am
login
or
register
to post comments
info 2
I can't interpret Fig. 2 E (similiella male genit) in Bottimer (1926).
When one has only 1 image a term such as "twice as long" is meaningless.
However, the harpe in my image, which I believe is the thin pointed rod on the lower curve of the left valve, seems short - suggests similiella.
Those pale circular structures could be the harpes, if so, don't know if they are short or long!
…
A.W. Thomas
, 28 April, 2020 - 8:25am
login
or
register
to post comments
Isophrictis rudbeckiella
I see now that
Bottimer (1926)
, p. 807, fig. 2 E, illustrates true
similiella
genitalia and that, per Bottimer (1926), p. 808, the illustration of
similiella
in
Heinrich (1921)
, pl. 95, fig. A, is actually that of
rudbeckiella
. The harpe would appear to refer to the valva. Yours are twice the length of those for similiella. Please take a look and let me know what you think.
Hasbrouck (1964), p.
683
, fig. shows the harpe.
…
Steve Nanz
, 26 May, 2020 - 4:07pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Links broken
Steve, the link to the 1926 Bottimer paper in J. Agr. Res. is obsolete. Unfortunately, BHL doesn't currently have a digitized version of that volume (that I can find). Know of an alternate online source?
…
Chuck Sexton
, 17 November, 2023 - 10:06am
login
or
register
to post comments
Link Replaced
I think you now need an account to see it, so I replaced with a URL I found to an archived copy using the
Wayback Machine
at Internet Archive.
…
Steve Nanz
, 19 November, 2023 - 4:13am
login
or
register
to post comments
Thanks Steve
for your research, will move these to rudbeckiella
…
A.W. Thomas
, 27 May, 2020 - 6:38am
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.