Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Photos of insects and people from the 2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho July 24-27

Moth submissions from National Moth Week 2024

Photos of insects and people from the 2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico, July 20-24

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Photos of insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29


Previous events


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#1780500
moth - Isophrictis rudbeckiella - male

moth - Isophrictis rudbeckiella - Male
Groton, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, USA
July 1, 2016
moth genitalia
Identification was made by Steve Nanz (incorrect ID by Tony Thomas)

Images of this individual: tag all
moth - Isophrictis rudbeckiella - male moth - Isophrictis rudbeckiella - male

Moved

Info?
I tried to compare this with the illustrations of similiella in Bottimer (1926) and rudbeckiella, erroneously named similiella, in Heinrich, (1921). Bottimer says "Both species have the harpe of the male genitalia divided, but in the new species it is nearly twice as long as in similiella." I don't know enough about genitalia to tell what this. I added the references to both species pages. Could you please reconfirm the ID for MPG?

 
info 2
I can't interpret Fig. 2 E (similiella male genit) in Bottimer (1926).
When one has only 1 image a term such as "twice as long" is meaningless.
However, the harpe in my image, which I believe is the thin pointed rod on the lower curve of the left valve, seems short - suggests similiella.
Those pale circular structures could be the harpes, if so, don't know if they are short or long!

 
Isophrictis rudbeckiella
I see now that Bottimer (1926), p. 807, fig. 2 E, illustrates true similiella genitalia and that, per Bottimer (1926), p. 808, the illustration of similiella in Heinrich (1921), pl. 95, fig. A, is actually that of rudbeckiella. The harpe would appear to refer to the valva. Yours are twice the length of those for similiella. Please take a look and let me know what you think.

Hasbrouck (1964), p. 683, fig. shows the harpe.

 
Links broken
Steve, the link to the 1926 Bottimer paper in J. Agr. Res. is obsolete. Unfortunately, BHL doesn't currently have a digitized version of that volume (that I can find). Know of an alternate online source?

 
Link Replaced
I think you now need an account to see it, so I replaced with a URL I found to an archived copy using the Wayback Machine at Internet Archive.

 
Thanks Steve
for your research, will move these to rudbeckiella

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.