Change of Scolopendra logipes to Scolopendra alternans in the classification
Dear all,
I am a myriapodologist, specialized on New World Scolopendromorpha. I have observed that BugGuide is using an unaccepted classification for Scolopendra alternans: the "revival" of S. longipes by Mercurio (2016) (http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4111.1.1). The revival has not been accepted by the community and databases, as it is based on a wrong interpretation of the available data. By usage and consensus, S. longipes remains a synonym of S. alternans. See:
1. Myriatrix: http://myriatrix.myspecies.info/myriatrix/scolopendra-longipes
2. ChiloBase 2.0: https://chilobase.biologia.unipd.it/searches/result_species/1371
3. Chagas-Jr. & Galvis Jiménez (2018: 161) wrote referring to Mercurio (2016) S. alternans splitting: "However, his statistical analysis is incomplete and insufficient" (https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4425.1.9).
4. Three recent papers did not cite the unsupported revival and kept S. alternans: 1) Schileyko (2018), Scolopendromorpha St. Barthélemy (https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4438.1.2). 2) Schileyko et al. (2018), Scolopendromorpha Martinique (https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4486.4.9). 3) Martínez-Muñoz & Perez-Gelabert (2018), Chilopoda of Hispaniola (https://doi.org/10.33800/nc.v0i12.86).
Two of us are database maintainers: Daniel Perez-Gelabert (ITIS) and myself (Myriatrix). As BugGuide photographic records are being ingested by GBIF (under S. alternans), I thought that you would like to know the information above and maybe run an update of the BugGuide taxonomic backbone before the next GBIF ingestion.
Kind regards,
Carlos
P.S.: This post is a version of an email initially sent to the database maintainer, who suggested posting it in this forum.
|