Ok, this is kind of odd

I would not take it personally, as most of us here done know each other in real life...Uber common species, blurry or distant images, or images of squashed or otherwise damaged individuals get my signal to frass, but I do leave my reason why in every case...I would use it as an opportunity to attempt to ID things on your own (species with boatloads of images and comments available for comparison) and only when you have exhausted your ID attempts, use it as an opportunity to improve your photography and post images that folks can use to help you hang a name on. From what I have seen. Coming from a systematics side of things, some of your images would prove difficult to help you get an ID. Many amateurs don't understand that MANY insects are literally impossible to ID from Images, and can be quite difficult with the specimen in front of you and all the available keys at your disposal. Blurry and/or distant pictures of specimens can frustrate both the contributor in not getting anyone to help them and getting frassed, and to the person attempting an ID in not being able to help. I've posted perfectly clear, high resolution images of unknowns and only find out that the image is useless for ID. As an example, the weevil genus Listronotus has many images here to only the genus level and may never be able to be further identified unless the photographer was able to dissect the genitalia and take a picture of the parts. Are these pictures valuable to keep or should they be discarded? Some are very nice images but are useless for ID, which the contributor most likely wanted. Again, I think you should use your experiences as learning tools, but I certainly agree with you in that whoever is frassing should leave a message on at least a few as to why.