Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#1907153
Sumitrosis sp. - Baliosus nervosus

Sumitrosis sp. - Baliosus nervosus
McKerrall Woods, Chatham-Kent, Ontario, Canada
October 17, 2020
Sumitrosis inaequalis or S. rosea?

Moved Tentatively
Moved from Chalepini.

Would like expert confirmation

Moved
Moved from Sumitrosis rosea.

Moved
Moved from ID Request.

definitely on the pale side

 
A dilemma....
I had posted this on iNaturalist at about the same time, and just yesterday a beetle specialist identified this as Baliosus nervosus
https://inaturalist.ca/observations/62942183
As I am not a beetle expert by any means, I defer to the experts but this presents a dilemma. There were quite a few of these critters, and all were on American Beech.

Any thoughts?

 
I'm not a specialist, just an amateur editor
to me yours looks more elongate than most of the ones in B. nervosus but I'll have to defer to the experts here.

 
Ok, thank-you!
*

 
I dug up a key to Chalepini (Butte, 1968)
Sumitrosis has 8 to 8.5 rows of punctures while Baliosus has 10 to 10.5. I'm not positive how to count the punctures but comparing yours to photos I've had IDed from specimens of the two genera the intervals do seem to match those of Baliosus.

 
Good to know...
...I checked A. A. Evans Beetles of E NA book and it indicated that Sumitrosis has a small groove in the middle of the head, whereas Baliosus doesn't. While that part of my image isn't as sharp as it might be, it doesn't appear to have any type of small groove, but a more rounded appearance, suggesting Baliosus. Unfortunately I only had a good quality Canon zoom lens, with a reasonable macro focus but not my high quality Canon macro lens, and even at that, this image had to be cropped quite a bit. Therefore the top of the head isn't in the sharpest focus.

S. rosea has pale antennae
S. inaequalis' are dark

 
Thanks, John....
I noted that in some of the reference material, but then checked various images of each here on BG and saw that often there wasn't much difference in pale vs dark between the two species. This individual isn't really dark or pale, but somewhere in between, so I am uncertain and need a more expert opinion.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.