Thanks, Diane! The ID looks pretty good. Too bad I did get into the spirit of doing a wing removal and photo. I say that because the combination of clear wings and lots of hairs on them might make a spectacular photo. Always assuming I could pull off the wing removal.

But of course you can use the photo! I hope I'll get to see your book when it's done! I'll add a couple photos of this tiny thing later!

I really thought it looked cool, myself. The wings seemed so dynamic, the veins seeming almost like bolts of lightning. But the reality is that I could not dare touch it for fear my laptop would be put in jeopardy. It proceeded to the edge of my screen and was content to let me take photos, and then I returned to my computing. I almost expected it to be there when I woke up.

Alfons Garcia Aldrete says it's not Hemipsocus. He's working on it. If you see any more while looking at your computer screen, please get out your aspirator!.

I do have a handy vac, a lens sucker, and a rocket blower, so don't feel too bad for me! I used to have a tiny clear tube vaccum designed for removing spiders from the home without ending their lives. My niece really liked it! So no more spider removal for me!

I thought someone mentioned a crossing of the veins on the forewing? Did I get it wrong? To bad because I tried to find a view I will add a couple photos.

I have very little experience collecting specimen, and my methods are pretty clumsy. My Lens Sucker may actually have worked had I tried it. All in all I consider this hunt for "Mypsocus adventicas" a success! And there has been some excitement with this one. I shouldn't be embarrassed because I didn't think of trying an aspirator. I should be glad I came up with anything.

to make it easier to follow the dialog. You're picture specific comment belonged there but not my additional thought before adding Frame 4:

...with just the slightest change of angle, lighting, or background.

I have a couple shots where I would swear there were to white lines behind the ocelli like this:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~o~~o~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~/~~~~~~\~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

But since they are completely absent from other views I think maybe they are more likely to be light due to contours. They did not turn out great. Now I think maybe I should add one. I'll just add one.

Dang! I forgot this program takes out spaces, ruining my pictogram. I'll try some filler. You get the idea. Maybe...

one other reason I liked adding Picture 4 was the red color around the mouth. It seemed real to me, but again not so much in all views. So notice the "lipstick" in #4, too.

...because it's been moved to a new species page (I think v got excited and overlooked the "not" in your comment above). It should be moved back to Psocodea or to another appropriate taxon.