Do all the moves look right?

Townes defined subgenus Chaetolabis containing Chironomus atroviridis and C. ochreatus (new species). The difference is slight: C. atroviridis is a bit larger, has most of the fore basitarsus brown instead of black, and usually has the side stripes on the thorax dark brown. C. ochreatus has the fore basitarsus entirely black and never has dark side stripes.

Authors since then have suppressed subgenus Chaetolabis, promoted it to a full genus, or synonymized the two species within.

If we follow Townes and nearctica (separate species):

C. atroviridis:
This one

C. ochreatus:


If you prefer to synonomize them the first name has priority.

Also, these are Chironomus decorus, except that "decorus" has been reinterpreted as a species group separable only by chromosome banding.

So they can go in species C. decorus, no taxon "C. decorus group", or subgenus Chironomus.

If you make the subgenus page, this one goes there too:
.
I think it is another decorus but I'm less sure.

I'll move it to genus for now, and wait for species confirmation. Thanks John!

I think this is Chironomus ochreatus (Townes). I need to do some more checking to make sure there isn't another midge that looks like this.

Moved from Midges.

Front legs are long. Wing veins aren't clear, but what's visible does not exclude Chironominae.

This one is a midge in the family Chironomidae - Chen