Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Interested in a 2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico?

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

National Moth Week 2020 photos of insects and people.

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Discussion, insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Photos of insects and people from the 2014 gathering in Virginia, June 4-7.

Previous events


Not able to do advanced search for this species

For some reason, in "advanced search," when I type in "Chrysoperla," only two taxon options appear, neither of which is the one I want (Chrysoperla rufilabris). The one I want is definitely in the guide, so I don't know why it isn't coming up. Any idea?

Re: advanced-search problem
Same problem with genus Tipula. I type in "Tipula" in the advanced search, and I get lots of subgenera, but not the genus.

Interesting.
It doesn't come up if you type in "Chrysoperla," but it comes up if you enter the Taxon ID#: 245329. Perhaps someone else will be able to explain why that is.

 
Some observations
It seems that this used to work correctly as I recall using advanced search with the expected results for at least a couple of the affected species. At present, it seems to be registering as if the taxon name is "pudica-group rufilabris". It looks like several of the subgeneric No Taxon pages are resulting in the same unexpected feature. The one species that appears as expected in the genus Chrysoperla is the one included species without a common name entered (C. externa).

 
re: advanced search issue
Thanks for the responses, everyone

 
Yes, exactly
While there is a page that has Chrysoperla externa as a common name, there is no taxon page that is Chrysoperla rufilabris either as a scientific name or a common name. You can get to that page by starting to type either "pudica-group" or "Red-lipped" because those are the scientific and common names associated with that page. You can find the page itself by doing a simple search for Chrysoperla rufilabris, because that word combination does appear in the text on the pudica-group rufilabris page. The No Taxon pages definitely disrupt advanced search's ability to interpret that you are looking for page 245329.

 
Re: Chrysoperla advanced-search problem
Sounds to me like a good solution would be to either create an "unidentified pudica-group" page and an "unidentified carnea-group" page on the same level as the species pages (instead of having the group pages as parents of the species pages) or simply do away with the group pages and move their info to the genus page. (There's a ton of great, well-organized info on the group pages--thanks to Jonathan, I assume; I wouldn't want to lose that info.)

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.