Steve – Thanks for sleuthing this out. I've gone back to this thing several times and was never happy with either N. constans or L. grotei. Just now I see that MPG puts it into the genus Pyromorpha.

The Pyromorpha rata image does look like the same species but the name used may be a mistake as well. This may be better clarified soon as I understand that this family is being updated. I'm not sure any update will change the species name on BugGuide for a while, though, because we try to go by All-Leps and so it would have to change too.

There seems to be general agreement about abandoning All-Leps as a standard (see, for instance, this discussion). I've proposed following MPG, and no one has come up with a viable alternative at this point, so that seems to be what we're doing these days. I've been working from the Excel sheet Bob sent me two months ago, which gives the taxonomy from superfamily to subtribe (where applicable). That spreadsheet, curiously, does not include this species, but the species list here uses Neoalbertia rata, so perhaps that's what we should go with.

I just responded to the discussion you mentioned. I back using MPG 100%. But in this case MPG is updating Zygaenidae pending release of an update in ZooKeys later this month. Once that happens, I think we should follow what MPG decides to do.

I actually created a page for Neoalbertia rata before I realized that a page for Neofelderia rata existed. I subsequently deleted it so all the images of that species stay together with the least amount of moving around.