Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#2198333
Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male

Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - Male
Colfax, Placer County, California, USA
September 10, 2022
Size: 3.5 mm
Location= 9 mi. south of Colfax, on Pine Lake Dr., 666 m elevation (2,185 ft).
GPS= 39.0649, -120.9439.

I collected 2 of these in a VFIT (Vertical Flight Intercept Trap) holding 100% Propylene Glycol after 20 days from Aug. 21 to Sept. 10, 2022.

I think it might a crabronid or parasitic bee, but I don't see any like it there.

Any suggestions greatly appreciated.

==================== Additional material added 20 Jan, 2023. ============================
Thanks to Paul De Ley for providing me with the publication including the key to species.

Key to species of Diploplectron (1) helped me determine the species.
Four pictures added to aid identification.
I believe this specimen is D. peglowi because:

1. Dorsal close-up of the clypeus showing the brown projections on the yellow clypeus with a rounded indentation between the projections.

2. Dorsal view of the head showing the relative position of the ocelli. Not an equilateral triangle, but the forward ocellus is further apart from the back ones than they are apart from each other, (D. Brunneipes ocelli = equilateral triangle).

3. Head facing left: base of mandible not meeting the compound eye (it does meet the eye in D. californicum).

4. Pygidium dorsal showing the lateral lines (difficult to catch, more of a dark shade on one side.

5. Not pictured, but the key states: "ratio between least interocular distance and length of flagellomeres 1 and 2 = 1:1.4. I measured my specimen to be 1:1.7 (D. Californium = 1:1.2).

6. Many other characters are easily visible in the pictures like black abdomen.

7. White lower frons and white clypeus is also shared with D. brunneipes, but brunneipes has the mandible meeting the compound eye and I think my specimen's mandible is separated from the eye.

Images of this individual: tag all
Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male Parasitic bee? - Diploplectron - male

Mostly fits Parker's description of Diploplectron peglowi?
At 3.5mm it's definitely on the small side, compared to Parker's 5-7.5mm for males of Diploplectron peglowi. But the following features all match with D. peglowi: ocellar triangle higher than wide, lateral ocelli at a distance from each other and from the nearest compound eye of just under one ocellar diameter, combined length of flagellomeres 1 & 2 just slightly greater than the shortest interocular distance, ivory markings on lower parts of the front (but not on the pronotum), 2 short teeth on clypeus separated by a curved indentation (not a sharp V), malar space shorter than one ocellar diameter.

 
Looked in Bohart [cite:361853]
Bohart's pub (1) lists a publication of Krombein, K. V.
Descriptions and records of new wasps from New York State. Bull. Brooklyn Ent. Soc. 34: 135- 144, which I thought would give me additional information, but couldn't find it to verify the species ID.

Also looked in Wasps by Holm (2), but that species isn't discussed there either.

Thanks for your description and comparison to my specimen. Do you think it merits creating a sp. page for it and moving it there?

 
I think creating the species page is warranted but...
...check your email for a very poorly made pdf of Parker 1972, hopefully that will allow you to evaluate better. As far as I can tell Parker is the best published source since it followed 30 years after Krombein. But a lot of the characters Parker relied on in his key and descriptions are of the "greater than/less than ocellar diameter" type and I've only just started looking into Diploplectron, so I have no expertise or experience for interpreting which ones might have genuinely higher or lower diagnostic value.

 
Thanks Paul
Yesterday I added information to the posting above and 4 pictures with explanations why after using the key the species is D. peglowi. I also requested V. Belov to look at it and create a new species page if he agrees with my assessment.

Moved

Moved

 
Venation
I saw the similarity also, but bumped into this guy which looks like a match - here and has a comment on that page:
"Diploplectron
Note the brown spot on hind wing apex, which is characteristic for males of many Diploplectron species.
… Matthias Buck,"

My guess would be a Crabronid
I can't say I'm certain, but I'm intrigued by the similarities in wing venation here:


 
I would go along with ...
... crabronid, so I'll move these to that page.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.