Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowse
Info
ImagesLinksBooksData

Subspecies Euphydryas chalcedona colon

Variable or Chalcedona Checkerspot, paradoxa female? - Euphydryas chalcedona - female Olympian - Euphydryas chalcedona at 4500 feet - Euphydryas chalcedona Snowberry Checkerspot - Euphydryas chalcedona Snowberry Checkerspot - Euphydryas chalcedona Snowberry Checkerspot - Euphydryas chalcedona - female Butterfly in WA (2) - Euphydryas chalcedona Euphydryas chalcedona colon - Euphydryas chalcedona
Show images of: caterpillars · adults · both
Classification
Kingdom Animalia (Animals)
Phylum Arthropoda (Arthropods)
Subphylum Hexapoda (Hexapods)
Class Insecta (Insects)
Order Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)
Superfamily Papilionoidea (Butterflies and Skippers)
Family Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Subfamily Nymphalinae (Crescents, Checkerspots, Anglewings, etc.)
Tribe Melitaeini
Genus Euphydryas (Checkerspots)
Species chalcedona (Chalcedon Checkerspot - Hodges#4517)
Subspecies colon (Euphydryas chalcedona colon)
Identification
Very similar to ssp. chalcedona, differing primarily more northerly distribution, and in having the postmedian row of white (or orange) spots (the row just outside of the middle row), reduced or even absent on the upper hind wing. This leaves an overall darker appearance to the insect in most individuals.
Range
Cascades of Washington to extreme northern California.
Remarks
There is disagreement on whether northern populations (basically north from California) should be separated as a separate species, Euphydryas colon, or just considered subspecies of E. chalcedona. The division seems to be totally arbitrary, with no obvious place where one stops and the other begins. Two of the better known regional treatments consider these northern populations to be subspecies of chalcedona yet maintain E. anicia as a distinct species. This seems closest to reality.

see:
'Butterflies of British Columbia', 2001, Crispin S. Guppy & Jon H. Shepard
'The Butterflies of Cascadia', 2002, Robert Michael Pyle
'Scientific Names List for Butterfly Species of North America, north of Mexico', 2003, Paul A. Opler
'Butterflies of Oregon, Their Taxonomy, Distribution, and Biology', 2005, Andrew D. Warren