Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Photos of insects and people from the 2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho July 24-27

Moth submissions from National Moth Week 2024

Photos of insects and people from the 2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico, July 20-24

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Photos of insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29


Previous events


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Full citation:
"Yu-Lingzi Zhou, James A Nicholls, Zhen-Hua Liu, Diana Hartley, Andras Szito, Adam Ślipiński, Andreas Zwick, Molecular Phylogeny of Dermestidae (Coleoptera) Reveals the Polyphyletic Nature of Trogoderma Latreille and the Taxonomic Placement of the Khapra Beetle Trogoderma granarium Everts, Insect Systematics and Diversity, Volume 6, Issue 6, November 2022, 2, https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixac026"

Extensive review of the family Dermestidae using genetic data. Focus of the article is mostly on Trogoderma and related genera (subtribe Trogodermina and less for tribe Megatomini), but important changes are noted for the whole family.

(Summary notes about changes left in comments)

Genetic tree of Dermestidae: (click to view full tree)

https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixac026

subfamily Megatominae (summary)
Three subtribes recovered in Megatomini:
Megatomina, Orphinina, Trogodermina

Hava also recognizes Cryptorhopalina and Anthrenocerina.

I already considered Anthrenocerina being invalid for iNaturalist taxonomy, as genus Anthrenocerus is nested inside "Australian Trogoderma" clade (= genus Eurhopalus rev. nov.) One doubtful introduced species for US is Anthrenocerus australis (=Eurhopalus riguus) per Hava's catalogue, not sure if it has value to be in the guide yet, I have not seen valid observations.

Not sure about Cryptorhopalina (includes Cryptorhopalum from Nearctic, Claviella from India) - I don't see big value in it yet. So, moving genus Cryptorhopalum to Trogodermina in guide might be reasonable in future.
In 2018 and 2015 version of catalogue all genera from Orphinina subtribe nov. belonged to Cryptorhopalina, but turns out Cryptorhopalum is closer to Trogoderma rather than Orphinina genera. Subtribe could have become redundant at this point. Per opinion in Zhou et al., 2022 Cryptorhopalum is synonymized with Trogodermina.

...

Megatomina: Globicornis (2), Megatoma
Globicornis is a palearctic genus but it was found that Dearthrus (D. longulus, D. stebbinsi) are nested within Globicornis. So, Globicornis (= Dearthrus syn. nov.) but still appears in "Revised Classification of Extant Dermestidae" of the article - I believe it's a mistake? because in Lawrence et al., 2022 they already mention one species as Globicornis stebbinsi.
Beal, 2004: "...some European specialists currently consider the genus Dearthrus LeConte a subgenus of Globicornis Erichson (Zhantiev 1976; Hava 2003) ... Until the relationships of the genera have been clarified by cladistic studies, especially studies employing larval structures, I suggest maintaining Dearthrus as a distinct genus."
The cladistic (molecular genetic) studies have been done, once again pointing that they form one group where Dearthrus species are inside Globicornis, so I think the reason to synonimize is reasonable.

Trogodermina: Trogoderma + [Phradonoma + Eurhopalus rev. nov.]
(for Nearctic, excluding Cryptorhopalum for now)
Eurhopalus is sister clade to Phradonoma, so they're more related to each other than to Trogoderma.
Some Trogoderma ended up being transferred to Eurhopalus including those found in Nearctic:
Eurhopalus vespulae (from Reesa, introduced South American), Eurhopalus angustus (introduced South American), Eurhopalus primus

Also possibly these in future, in case Nearctic revision takes place: Trogoderma ballfinchae, Trogoderma fasciferum (and Trogoderma cavum?). They're a lot like some Australian Eurhopalus.
What I just found is Beal, 2003 (nearctic key) states: "There is need of a world revision of the genus [Trogoderma]. The polyphyletic nature of the genus is exemplified by species as markedly different as T. glabrum (Herbst), T. cavum Beal, T. fasciferum Blatchley, and T. carteri Armstrong. Furthermore, species of Phradonoma appear to have no characters exclusively distinguishing them from all species of Trogoderma."
And what he said back in the day is well confirmed with the new genetic research.
Hava remains rather conservative and did not accept the split of Trogoderma and Eurhopalus. iNaturalist taxonomy remains with Trogoderma kept in broad sense, for now.

Orphinina, new subtribe that contains: Caccoleptus (1 sp.), Orphinus (1), Thaumaglossa (2) in the south and Hawaiian genus Labrocerus (17).

...

Ctesias is removed from Megatomini:Ctesiina, now in separate tribe Ctesiini. Genetically closer to genus Anthrenus rather than previously thought Megatomini.

subfamily Dermestinae (summary)
Subfamily Thorictinae (genera like Thorictus and Thorictodes) are genetically nested inside Dermestinae, extremely closely to other genera in Dermestinae hence the new status as: tribe Thorictini. Not accepted by Hava. Same assignment brought up several times before this genetic research, possibly a point for debate, but there is more and more evidence to it being right assignment

Subgenus Dermestes is polyphyletic because it has subgenus Derbyana with morphologically extremely different species inside (D. ater is closer to Derbyana, than D. ater compared to D. lardarius). Hence, they might split up in more subgenera later

subfamily Attageninae (summary)
Lanorus (syn. Paranovelsis)
More details on iNaturalist post
In short: Dermestes vigintiguttatus Fabricius, 1775 (= Attagenus or Paranovelsis punctatus) is a type species of Lanorus Mulsant & Rey, 1868
Paranovelsis is a later taxon (Casey, 1900) that was used for Nearctic species

Telopes and Aethriostoma elevated to generic level
Attagenus fasciatus and Attagenus bifasciatus are found to be part of Telopes. I would advise to postpone until further research is done (same done for iNaturalist taxonomy - see post). Because: though not explained further in the article, it might mean nearly half of Attagenus (sensu lato) are closer to Telopes rather than to Attagenus, in my opinion at least

Apphianus, Araphonotos and Egidyella (these from Nearctic - but also genus Sefrania) remain with uncertain position inside Attageninae pending further molecular research.
All of them are quite rare species, most from deserty areas as far as I remember.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.