Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Photos of insects and people from the 2014 gathering in Virginia, June 4-7.

Photos of insects and people from the 2013 gathering in Arizona, July 25-28

Photos of insects and people from the 2012 gathering in Alabama

Photos of insects and people from the 2011 gathering in Iowa

Photos from the 2010 Workshop in Grinnell, Iowa

Photos from the 2009 gathering in Washington

TaxonomyBrowse
Info
ImagesLinksBooksData

Genus Enoplognatha

Spider - Enoplognatha ovata Unknown Spider - Enoplognatha marmorata Bonus - Enoplognatha ovata - female Adult Male - Enoplognatha intrepida - male Cobweb spider SK - Enoplognatha marmorata Spotted spider in tree is? - Enoplognatha ovata Enoplognatha marmorata - male Enoplognatha marmorata - male
Classification
Kingdom Animalia (Animals)
Phylum Arthropoda (Arthropods)
Subphylum Chelicerata (Chelicerates)
Class Arachnida (Arachnids)
Order Araneae (Spiders)
Infraorder Araneomorphae (True Spiders)
No Taxon (Entelegynes )
Family Theridiidae (Cobweb Spiders)
Genus Enoplognatha
Numbers
10 species in BugGuide's range (North America north of Mexico)
Size
Females 3.0-9.0 mm, males 2.8-6.5 mm(1)
Identification
Careful: E. caricis has a somewhat similar abdominal pattern as E. marmorata, and their ranges overlap pretty extensively. See diagrams on page 12 of Levi 1957(2) for help distinguishing these two species.

Also, Levi 1957a(2) says that E. selma has basically the same abdominal pattern as E. caricis, but the ranges do not overlap in the case of those two species.
Range
E. caricis: Alaska and east of the Rocky Mountains. (2)(3)
E. intrepida: Alaska & all of Canada (as well as above the timberline in the Rocky Mountains), south to Minnesota and Pennsylvania. (2)(4)
E. joshua: western United States plus BC, AB, & SK; also rare in the southeastern USA. (2)(4)(3)
E. latimana: introduced to North America from Europe; appears to live along the western seaboard of N. America, plus a few spot records in southeastern Canada: QC & NS. (4)+Oxford & Reillo 1994
E. maricopa: only published records are from Arizona and eastern California. (3)
E. marmorata: widespread throughout the USA and southern Canada. (4)(3)
E. ovata: introduced to North America from Europe; northeastern states and adjacent Canada plus Pacific Coast states and British Columbia. (5)(2)
E. selma: California and southern Oregon. (2)
E. thoracica: introduced to N. America from Europe; now found in WA, OR, BC, & QC. (2)(6)(4)
E. wyuta: South Dakota to Utah, but also BC. (2)(4)
See Also
Theridion have the bottom eye row in a slight downward curve, with a gap between the rows, while in Enoplognatha the four bottom eyes lie almost straight across with hardly any space between the rows:

      Theridion           Enoplognatha


Also in E. ovata the carapace has a dark border line. That line is often missing in Theridion species.
Works Cited
1.Spiders of North America: An Identification Manual
D. Ubick, P. Paquin, P.E. Cushing and V. Roth (eds). 2005. American Arachnological Society.
2.The spider genera Enoplognatha, Theridion, and Paidisca in America north of Mexico (Araneae, Theridiidae)
H.W. Levi. 1957. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 112, article 1, 123 p.
3.The spider genera Steatoda and Enoplognatha in America (Araneae, Theridiidae)
Herbert Levi. 1962. Psyche, Cambridge 69: 11-36.
4.Checklist of the spiders (Araneae) of Canada and Alaska
Paquin, Buckle, Duperre, & Dondale. 2010. Zootaxa 2461: 1–170.
5.How to Know the Spiders
B. J. Kaston. 1978. WCB/McGraw-Hill.
6.An annotated checklist of the spiders of Washington
R.L. Crawford. 1988. Burke Mus. Contrib. Anthrop. Nat. Hist. 5: 1-48.